2009-08-09, 16:37
clackerdacker Wrote:+1
At the very least you should read it in and write it back out so we can maintain them by hand as at the moment it seems to disregard nodes it's umaware of.
clackerdacker Wrote:I don't understand why you seem to be so against even reading this in and writing it back out. You do for originaltitle. This is now a valid nfo file node and therefore should be supported by media managers, no?
nul7 Wrote:If/when sets support is added, will that not replace sorttitle? Why would you use sorttitle for a non-grouped movie?
I don't understand it either...
Why would sorttitle be useful once this kind of functionality is in place:
http://forum.xbmc.org/showpost.php?p=383...tcount=118
I don't even understand why sorttitle is useful in itself as of today?
Why would you want to have a different title for sorttitle? I mean why would you like to have both originaltitle and sortitle? If you set a sorttitle, where would you use originaltitle? If you want to solve the sorting issue, why you're not just renaming the originaltitle? I really don't see the point in having both title.
Open my eyes guys!
And as for this one:
clackerdacker Wrote:I don't understand why you seem to be so against even reading this in and writing it back out. You do for originaltitle. This is now a valid nfo file node and therefore should be supported by media managers, no?
Please let us decide... You didn't so much as bother to open a feature request for this feature....