2009-09-15, 06:21
because jimbosis took that completely out of his ass. the kricker builds are using directx but that has feck all to do with direct show.
althekiller Wrote:I'm the team pessimist and skeptic, how else do you expect me to act?
EDIT: That and I'm pretty sure the team consensus is that dshow is utter trash.
ssip96 Wrote:how's one supposed to enjoy the benefits of XBMC with an older machine?..
ssip96 Wrote:hmm.. but this way as stated above i lose all functions of XBMC...
will using XBMC on linux be better on my system and enable me to use the port of coreAVC or enable smoother playback somehow?
spiff Wrote:coreavc respected? HA. cheating closed source commercial POS
zag2me Wrote:What functions do you need?I use an external player to view videos, pause, ffwd, rrwd, resume thats all. There is no difference that I can notice. Infact I prefer the zoomplayer OSD, its beautiful.
spiff Wrote:disable the loop filter in ffmpeg (which is where most of the speed of coreavc sterns from) and the differences are not all that big at all.
spiff Wrote:disable the loop filter in ffmpeg (which is where most of the speed of coreavc sterns from) and the differences are not all that big at all.Is it doable in XBMC somehow? Just for testing purposes...
ashlar Wrote:Is it doable in XBMC somehow? Just for testing purposes...
Also, am I wrong in stating that CoreAVC "cheats" only if you enable deblocking skip?
ubiq Wrote:(modern) NVidia GPU + Linux = VDPAU
ssip96 Wrote:i thought coreAVC's one of the more respected codecs out there...
anyhow without support in other codecs... how's one supposed to enjoy the benefits of XBMC with an older machine?..
zag2me Wrote:What functions do you need?I use an external player to view videos, pause, ffwd, rrwd, resume thats all. There is no difference that I can notice. Infact I prefer the zoomplayer OSD, its beautiful.
McGilljam Wrote:I'm not alone or am I?