Posts: 99
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation:
0
Does anyone know if this driver is going to be the default in the Stable release of XBMC 10.00?
Posts: 470
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation:
0
I didn't try 256.52, but it seems like anything below 256.53 doesn't work with Dharma beta1. Cheers!!
MINIX NEO U22-XJ | Denon AVC-X3800H | KEF Q750 | KEF Q250c | KEF Q150 | KEF Q50a | KEF Kube 10 MIE | LG OLED65G16LA | CoreELEC
Posts: 542
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation:
1
I've been using Xbmc SVN with older nVidia drivers than 256.53, I don't see why they wouldn't work, unless you're talking about Ubuntu packages specifically. And even then, the Xorg driver isn't tied to a particular xbmc version. That would be pure madness.
* MikroTik RB5009UG+S+IN :: ZyXEL GS1900-8HP v1 :: EAP615-Wall v1 :: Netgear GS108T v3 running OpenWrt 23.05
* LibreELEC 11:
HTPC Gigabyte Brix GB-BXA8-5545 with
CEC adapter, Sony XR-64A84K ::
Desktop AMD Ryzen 7 5800X / Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon 6700XT / 27" Dell U2717D QHD
* Debian Bookworm x86_64: Celeron G1610, NFS/MariaDB/ZFS server
*
Blog
Posts: 209
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation:
23
256.52 works fine for me on Dharma beta installed to an Acer Revo with XBMCfreak livecd
Posts: 1,256
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation:
29
h.udo
Is a huge ABBA fan
Posts: 1,256
How did you updated to 256.53? Manually, with a nvidia-whatever-new-version.run file? Or with a deb package?
Again, it's the same driver... with a bumped minor.
Posts: 470
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation:
0
As I said before, I never tried 256.52, so probably that would work as well. What I meant is I tried 185.x.x and 195.x.x, which didn't work.
I should have upgraded using deb package (I didn't know that repo with all the latest drivers); I did manually, using the nVidia .run file. Cheers!!
MINIX NEO U22-XJ | Denon AVC-X3800H | KEF Q750 | KEF Q250c | KEF Q150 | KEF Q50a | KEF Kube 10 MIE | LG OLED65G16LA | CoreELEC
Posts: 1,756
Joined: Feb 2006
MacUsers Wrote:I didn't try 256.52, but it seems like anything below 256.53 doesn't work with Dharma beta1. Cheers!!
This goes to show speculation is naf.
FYI 256.52 is exactly same as 256.53 only different signature.
Posts: 51
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
0
I know that upgrading linux (kernel modules) broke my nvidia driver modules (which were installed manually), so I had to reinstall drivers.
Posts: 1,756
Joined: Feb 2006
MacUsers Wrote:I didn't try 256.52, but it seems like anything below 256.53 doesn't work with Dharma beta1. Cheers!!
MacUsers Wrote:I don't know what exactly you meant - by saying "anything below 256.53" I simply meant 185.x.x and 195.x.x; I didn't even know there is a v256.52 driver. If I knew that, I'd try v256.52 from the repo rather than downloading driver from nVidia website. Cheers!!
You said it not me!! lol, whatever your smoking Ill have some.
zeldi Wrote:I know that upgrading linux (kernel modules) broke my nvidia driver modules (which were installed manually), so I had to reinstall drivers.
This is why using a PPA is better then compiling or installing standalone programs/drivers.
Posts: 1,256
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation:
29
h.udo
Is a huge ABBA fan
Posts: 1,256
A 'sudo apt-cache policy nvidia-current' will give you the information you are looking for.
Then, if you wish to install, a 'sudo apt-get install nvidia-current' will install latest available version.
Be careful about your previous installed version. I never performed an update changing repositories (from nvidia-vdpau/ppa to ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates, for instance).
If this is your case, you might have to remove the previous installed version first to avoid conflicts.
hudo