Intel NUC - Haswell (4th Generation CPU) - Printable Version +- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv) +-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=222) +--- Forum: Hardware (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=112) +--- Thread: Intel NUC - Haswell (4th Generation CPU) (/showthread.php?tid=176718) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
|
RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - tfouto - 2014-01-13 (2014-01-11, 14:32)john.cord Wrote: Yes but this "Celeron N2820" is way more powerful compared to the Celeron 847 (1,1GHz vs. 2,4GHz). Btw, this was just a example. There will be "h" NUCs with i3 and i5 too. The "h" stands for "high" wich means that there is space for a standard 2,5" HDD or SSD. I am not so sure... http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Celeron+847+%40+1.10GHz http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Celeron+N2810+%40+2.00GHz&id=2109 the second link is the N2810 and not the 2820. But almost the same. Only 0,4 ghz... I dont understand this results... Maybe because of 2MB vs 1MB Cache? Re: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - nickr - 2014-01-13 Clock speed isn't everthing, in fact it is less and less important these days. RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - john.cord - 2014-01-13 Synthetic benchmark... RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - gamble - 2014-01-13 Something is still not compl. running right with VA-API, every now and then when i start a new movie i get no sound and heavy stutter again but i dont have a clue how it triggers.. Starting a log after the problem occurs wouldnt make much sense i guess..? RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - -DDD- - 2014-01-13 The Log is always started, or do you mean the Debug Level? RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - john.cord - 2014-01-13 (2014-01-13, 00:22)tfouto Wrote:(2014-01-11, 14:32)john.cord Wrote: Yes but this "Celeron N2820" is way more powerful compared to the Celeron 847 (1,1GHz vs. 2,4GHz). Btw, this was just a example. There will be "h" NUCs with i3 and i5 too. The "h" stands for "high" wich means that there is space for a standard 2,5" HDD or SSD. I would not rely on that site... the old celeron is 17W TDP and the new one 4,5/7,5W with the same power in that synthetic Benchmark wich says nothing about real world performance... RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - fritsch - 2014-01-13 I am a bit pessimistic, especially for the Yadif Usage later on. If "real world cpu benchmarks" are slower than Celeron 1007, I don't see a chance there. For non interlaced, so progressive content. It might not be an issue at all, as this is purely done with VAAPI. RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - gamble - 2014-01-13 (2014-01-13, 09:50)-DDD- Wrote: The Log is always started, or do you mean the Debug Level? I mean if i start debugging while the problem is already triggered.. RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - tfouto - 2014-01-13 (2014-01-13, 11:14)john.cord Wrote:(2014-01-13, 00:22)tfouto Wrote:(2014-01-11, 14:32)john.cord Wrote: Yes but this "Celeron N2820" is way more powerful compared to the Celeron 847 (1,1GHz vs. 2,4GHz). Btw, this was just a example. There will be "h" NUCs with i3 and i5 too. The "h" stands for "high" wich means that there is space for a standard 2,5" HDD or SSD. Well maybe that's the reason. This new Celeron have much less power, at the expense of performance. They managed to lower power comsumption, and level the performance. I think this CPU score is a good indicator of real world performance. Synthetic benchmarks are not everything for sure, but they give at least some useful information. Sandy Bridge->Ivy bridge->Haswell had only marginal performance improvements ~ 10%. Power consumption/tablets is where Intel is focusing right now. RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - hellow - 2014-01-13 (2014-01-12, 23:03)-DDD- Wrote: why don't you set it to 20% like the others? i dont dare to, my cpu idle is at 42-43 c with fanspeed at default. It seems a bit hot compared to the reviews im reading, idle temp is at 31 c. I starting to suspect there might be something wrong with my fan. RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - CaptainPsycho - 2014-01-13 (2014-01-13, 00:22)tfouto Wrote:(2014-01-11, 14:32)john.cord Wrote: Yes but this "Celeron N2820" is way more powerful compared to the Celeron 847 (1,1GHz vs. 2,4GHz). Btw, this was just a example. There will be "h" NUCs with i3 and i5 too. The "h" stands for "high" wich means that there is space for a standard 2,5" HDD or SSD. Quite easy to understand when you know that these "Celerons" are basically higher clocked "Atoms", There will be also "Pentiums" based on the silbermont architecture. They are not based on haswell. RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - fritsch - 2014-01-13 They have out of order execution and SSE, MMX per Core. That's a big difference. RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - -DDD- - 2014-01-13 43°C isn't hot for me. @ gamble: Yes, i would act like this: - see if you see any Error in the existing Logfiles, post the existing Logfile if you see something and can't fix it - activate Debug Level and try to reproduce the Failure RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - zag - 2014-01-13 The Haswell can run up to 90 degrees C, it just slows down a bit. Apparently its quite indestructible Mine runs at 74 maximum when playing music. Playing videos is around 40 max AW: RE: Intel NUC - HTPC (Haswell Late 2013 edition) - john.cord - 2014-01-13 (2014-01-13, 14:38)fritsch Wrote: They have out of order execution and SSE, MMX per Core. That's a big difference. Yes and for a dedicatedt xbmc box enough power for most of the users. |