2016-06-21, 01:10
2016-07-02, 13:02
(2016-06-13, 04:34)lmyllari Wrote: The format is quite different, but it wouldn't be hard to support. The resolution is only 16x16x16 though.
I'm guessing you'd get better results with DisplayCAL (formerly dispcalGUI).
I can look into adding support for this format after the PR is (hopefully) merged.
Hi Imyllari
I see the PR is merged so if you have a little time can you look to add the format support.
2016-07-04, 01:58
Congrats on the merge! Now we can close this thread and make a new one in a more suitable subforum.
2016-07-04, 18:18
Can anyone confirm if the Intel Celeron N3150 has enough power to utilize 3dluts?
2016-07-04, 22:35
2016-07-04, 23:30
(2016-07-04, 22:35)b0mb Wrote:(2016-07-04, 18:18)Jdiesel Wrote: Can anyone confirm if the Intel Celeron N3150 has enough power to utilize 3dluts?The N3700 doesn't have so the N3150 should not work....
Gesendet von meinem LG-D855 mit Tapatalk
Have you tried using a less intensive scaling algorithm when using 3dluts on your N3700? Maybe bicubic instead of lanczos3? Do you have "Enable HQ Scalers for scaling above 20%" set in you video settings? Does it struggle will all videos or just certain types?
2016-07-07, 17:08
b0mb, Jdiesel (or anyone else with a Celeron/Atom):
can you test the speed with smaller LUTs? If you're building from source, using lcms2 and a display profile allows you to change the LUT size from the OSD. Smaller resolution madVR 3DLUTs should work too.
I'm considering reinvestigating my original approach - using input curves, CLUT and output curves from the device link.
can you test the speed with smaller LUTs? If you're building from source, using lcms2 and a display profile allows you to change the LUT size from the OSD. Smaller resolution madVR 3DLUTs should work too.
I'm considering reinvestigating my original approach - using input curves, CLUT and output curves from the device link.
2016-07-07, 23:14
I don't have the time to create more luts at the moment but if someone could post some smaller ones I can try to test those 
Gesendet von meinem LG-D855 mit Tapatalk
Gesendet von meinem LG-D855 mit Tapatalk
2016-07-08, 02:47
I have a Chromebox Celeron, I tried the nightly PPA but that didn't work, and I can't be bothered to build from source atm. I'll be ready to chime in when alpha3 is released 
2016-07-20, 19:58
Is there a specific renderer needed or does this work for either the advanced shader or the basic shader?
Reason I ask is my i5 660 drops frames like crazy when using advanced shader with color management/3dlut. However using basic shader it runs fine (was color management working?). Even tried overclocking both the cpu and the GPU to no effect. I gather the shader performance sucks on the 660's GPU.
Note: was using recent Milhouse builds
Reason I ask is my i5 660 drops frames like crazy when using advanced shader with color management/3dlut. However using basic shader it runs fine (was color management working?). Even tried overclocking both the cpu and the GPU to no effect. I gather the shader performance sucks on the 660's GPU.
Note: was using recent Milhouse builds
2016-07-21, 00:05
It's only implemented for glsl. What's your output resolution?
I'm currently on vacation but I will work on improved performance when I get back. My hope is that a small CLUT with input and output curves will give good accuracy and be much friendlier on the GPU caches.
I'm currently on vacation but I will work on improved performance when I get back. My hope is that a small CLUT with input and output curves will give good accuracy and be much friendlier on the GPU caches.
2016-07-21, 00:28
(2016-07-21, 00:05)lmyllari Wrote: It's only implemented for glsl. What's your output resolution?Output resolution is 1080P, either 24hz or 60hz.
I'm currently on vacation but I will work on improved performance when I get back. My hope is that a small CLUT with input and output curves will give good accuracy and be much friendlier on the GPU caches.
