2013-02-01, 19:11
Well, I don't really get why a dual core 1.1 GHz CPU without hyper-threading should be 1.5x faster than ID80. Never ever I would exchange a ID80/84 for ID42.
(2013-01-31, 23:19)PatrickVogeli Wrote: I'd get the new ID42! A low voltage Core i3 paired with an Nvidia 610. That should be a very nice machine
(2013-02-01, 00:39)mobias1313 Wrote: They aren't for sale yet are they?
(2013-02-01, 19:11)FernetMenta Wrote: Well, I don't really get why a dual core 1.1 GHz CPU without hyper-threading should be 1.5x faster than ID80. Never ever I would exchange a ID80/84 for ID42.
Quote:An i3 against an Atom? Are you kidding?
(2013-02-02, 09:12)FernetMenta Wrote:Quote:An i3 against an Atom? Are you kidding?
What makes you think ID42 has an i3? I just found articles stating it would be a Celeron 1.1 GHz.
(2013-02-02, 10:12)PatrickVogeli Wrote: Ahm.. ok, you are right that zotac doesn't say the proc name:
Intel Core Processor (dual-core, 1.1 GHz)
Anyway, I'll still get the unknown Core 1.1GHz proc against the atom...
I know it's not quite the same, but I have 2 machines: one with a Pentium su4100 (2x1.3GHz, no HT) and another with an Atom 330 (2x1.6GHz, with HT). Want to guess which one is much faster? The "slower" pentium is much faster in everything, and is very noticeable. Clock speed is not everything.
EDIT: with the numbers we have, it could be a celeron 847