2016-01-25, 21:24
(2016-01-24, 16:30)thegrinch Wrote: Vénember, you do not seem to understand some basic principles of how these technologies work. First, I never used x11vnc but it seems to be similar to WinVNC, as it's able to provide a remote view of a physical desktop. For a video "surface" to be transferred effectively over low bandwidth (compared to most LANs nowadays) WAN links, it needs to be effectively compressed. There is no way around it to achieve a high quality video image. To use a remote desktop viewer for playing back such a video, the remoting technology needs to recompress it. Otherwise you get a slide show and choppy audio, if anything at all. Are you absolutely positive that x11vnc is able to effectively recompress any video displayed on your server (a part of the desktop), without quality loss? In that case, it might be a viable option. If the answer is definite no or no information, then you should just follow other's prior advice in this thread. Test with another player first on your server to make sure.
Personally, I don't see much point in doing that, since as others also mentioned, you can transfer or share the Kodi library with other clients. And then it boils down to simple file transfers over the WAN network and all should be good.
1. "Vénember, you do not seem to understand some basic principles of how these technologies work. "
Maybe. But i know what I want.
2- "First, I never used x11vnc but it seems to be similar to WinVNC,"
NO.
3. "provide a remote view of a physical desktop."
Lots of remote software can not support REAL display, Vnc also.
4. " To use a remote desktop viewer for playing back such a video,"
I do not play video, but organize and reach my media. Like the Plex does.
5. "you can transfer or share the Kodi library with other clients."
If you have lots of media it is practically impossible. And I can not reach KODI remotely, do you understand?