(2017-03-08, 11:52)trogggy Wrote: I don't use / have never used either, but the discussion towards the end of this thread suggests the reverse to me:
298571 (thread)
lucky me, i don't have that problem. while it's true that berryboot's pro/con rests at it's one-kernel-multiple-os method, i've yet to encounter any problem with kodi flavours since mid last year.
i even dare say that while osmc devs told me it's hard/impossible/not supported to implement osmc+berryboot, in my own personal experience it's more stable to use OSMC with berryboot via
Alex Gold's image than the normal/supported way. I can even upgrade/downgrade libreELEC+berryboot via the normal update folder way, which I couldn't do it with xbmc 15.
YMMV, as usual. it's good to have choices. this is my experience, and I hope yours will be the same. frankly speaking it's just easier and faster for me to backup (and later restore) via berryboot img backup rather than kodi/osmc's tar/libreelec backup method, and that reason alone is enough for me to wholeheartedly recommend berryboot over noobs or direct image flash.
the only issue left with berryboot in my 2017 experience is with installing OS that heavily depends on overlayFS like Hypriot/RancherOS...... whatever that means
I managed to install docker via DietPi+berryboot anyway so not a big deal.
I don't know if I did say this, but you can also install OSMC+Retropie's Kodi+LibreELEC+OpenELEC+Batocera's Kodi+Recalbox's Kodi+Peach Pi TV+other kinds of all in one sd card if you want.