(jmarshall @ mar. 29 2005,18:32 Wrote:xbmc does use exif rotation information. perhaps you need to upgrade?
i beg to differ...
my files appear to have valid exif information. yet xbmc still displays them in landscape only.
this is the exif info from a portrait image on an smb share...
Quote:r:\pictures\rotation test\img_0149.jpg
make: canon
model: canon powershot s330
date modified: sunday, december 26, 2004 1:19:18 pm
orientation: left side / bottom
x-resolution: 180/1
y-resolution: 180/1
resolution unit: inch
ycbcr-positioning: 1
this is from a landscape image on an smb share...
Quote:r:\pictures\rotation test\img_0151.jpg
make: canon
model: canon powershot s330
date modified: friday, december 31, 2004 6:17:01 pm
orientation: top / left side
x-resolution: 180/1
y-resolution: 180/1
resolution unit: inch
ycbcr-positioning: 1
this info was pulled from two of my photos by a proggy called 'exifer'.
notice the orientation flags are different, yet xbmc still displays them both as landscape.
now i know that the older builds of xbmc handled all my picture orientation properly, they were all auto-rotated. recent builds (i'm using 30 may 2005 build) have stopped auto rotating. flipping them with the remote is a big pain!
if anyone can shed some light on this, i'd be keenly interested. even if i must touch all my protrait images with some tool.
curiously....some pictures that i have that lack any exif data at all (scans)....the 'protraits' are displayed properly.
i'm no expert on this stuff, i just know that xbmc started 'ignoring' the rotations that have always been there in my photos recently. i'd be happy to share any photos with someone who can tell me my exif data is garbage etc... i just want to