2009-07-05, 07:07
jmarshall Wrote:That's a workaround, not a fix. I'm not opposed to it, but won't waste my time implementing it when it doesn't actually address the problem.
The problem is trivial to fix: Instead of storing the hash just for the directory, we store a hash per item. Thus, not only do we know when a directory may need rescanning, but we also know which items in that directory need rescanning. Ofcourse, there's no point implementing this fix at this point - I shall simply ensure that this is part of the new filescanners.
Cheers,
Jonathan
Gotcha... didn't know you guys created hashes for the directories, which is brilliant. Going to steal that idea. lol