wsume99 Wrote:I saw that review as well. I think it's interesting to note that even the A8-3850 failed their 3D playback test when just using the CPU only.it is expected to fail without igpu, but i3 failed to playback 3d with its cpu+igpu. another word, i3 cannot playback 3d at all. for cpu+igpu package, there is nothing better than a8-3850 on the market at this price!
eskro Wrote:going with the A4-3400 under win7 + XBMC,+1, or a6-3600 quad-core at 65w!
i know users will be afraid of Skin performance and stuff like that...
so to end all uncertainties, users should just grab the A6-3500 Triple-core!!!
end of story
bluray Wrote:+1, or a6-3600 quad-core at 65w!
wsume99 Wrote:That's a very reasonable approach. At least until we have more info on the A4-3400 from real world users but on paper it should be plenty.
Myth Wrote:However the A8-3800 should also be only 65W. I was actually trying to get me one of those but they seem to be difficult to find. Price difference between the A6-3600 and A8-3850 is only 15€ as well.if that is the case, it's probably better investment to go with a8-3850 then!
Making decissions is hard ...
Ferrino Wrote:How did you get on with the A8-3850 and a 150W PicoPSU?150W psu for A8-3850 might be a bit on the edge. For 150W psu, the low power A8-3800 or A6-3600 is a better choice!
