Why not WMC as backend?
JuggalotusHeat
Member
Posts: 74
#249
2013-05-23, 00:22
All of this has already be done and there is an installer available. Just search this thread for "quickwmc"
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 17:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 18:19
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 23:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jajoflo - 2012-09-05, 02:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 00:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by debennett2 - 2013-01-23, 21:22
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 02:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-10-29, 05:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-10-29, 16:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by joebrady - 2012-09-06, 05:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-18, 15:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-23, 17:00
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kreeturez - 2012-09-24, 00:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-24, 00:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-24, 01:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 15:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-26, 16:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 17:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-27, 10:26
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-09-27, 12:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-01, 04:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-10-02, 21:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-02, 23:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by DJShadow - 2012-10-12, 19:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ebucha - 2012-10-17, 21:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by benoire - 2012-10-22, 08:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Crimzin - 2012-10-24, 23:16
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by T800 - 2012-10-25, 08:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by svet-am - 2012-10-29, 15:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2012-10-17, 21:31
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-10-17, 21:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by sub3 - 2012-10-22, 17:39
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-01-24, 17:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-01-31, 16:10
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-01, 20:42
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 01:03
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 20:28
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 21:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-03, 20:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-03, 23:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Hijo del sol - 2013-02-04, 04:21
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 10:21
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 18:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by emveepee - 2013-02-05, 04:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bmn001 - 2013-02-05, 20:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-06, 11:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-08, 20:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 17:50
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-06, 18:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-07, 04:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 21:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-08, 15:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-08, 17:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-02-09, 16:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-10, 11:52
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by papreston - 2013-02-10, 15:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2013-02-10, 16:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-10, 16:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-11, 06:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-11, 13:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-12, 08:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-12, 14:42
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-12, 10:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-12, 13:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 14:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-02-15, 05:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-15, 05:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 20:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 17:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 21:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-02-20, 00:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-20, 03:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-20, 15:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-20, 20:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-21, 15:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 05:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 20:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 21:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 06:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 10:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-04, 15:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-03-05, 08:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mrkevbo - 2013-03-10, 23:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-03-11, 04:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Tyzing - 2013-03-11, 21:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-12, 10:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-12, 13:36
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 01:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 12:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 03:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 16:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 19:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-15, 01:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 12:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 18:22
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 21:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 21:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-14, 00:42
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-14, 03:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 07:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-09-22, 15:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Angelscry - 2013-09-22, 15:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 21:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-22, 18:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-18, 19:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-19, 00:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 16:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-22, 18:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 01:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ConfusedTA - 2013-03-19, 14:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-03-21, 10:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-03-22, 06:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by d3maxt - 2013-03-22, 17:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 09:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-23, 10:09
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 18:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by username145 - 2013-03-24, 00:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-24, 23:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 06:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-25, 09:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-25, 11:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by VladTepz - 2013-03-25, 12:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 19:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-26, 17:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-03-28, 05:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-29, 16:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 19:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-29, 19:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 22:48
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-30, 00:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-30, 21:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by moniker - 2013-03-31, 01:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-03-31, 03:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-04-02, 21:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-04, 10:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by justinobwi - 2013-04-04, 18:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Slappa - 2013-04-09, 13:09
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-04-10, 05:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-04-15, 16:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MyClosedEyes - 2013-04-17, 05:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by tcs2tx - 2013-04-19, 00:48
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-24, 13:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-04-24, 20:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-25, 08:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-04-29, 21:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Neebski - 2013-04-30, 18:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-05-06, 03:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-06, 07:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-06, 13:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-08, 16:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-08, 16:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 19:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-06, 19:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by micster - 2013-05-06, 21:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-07, 12:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-05-07, 15:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-07, 16:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-05-07, 22:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-09, 19:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-05-08, 23:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 23:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-10, 00:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-14, 02:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-21, 22:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-12, 20:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-13, 08:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rap777 - 2013-05-13, 10:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Bladed - 2013-05-21, 01:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Mankix - 2013-05-22, 17:58
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-22, 19:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-22, 20:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-05-22, 23:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-05-23, 00:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 00:22
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 02:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 04:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 09:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-05-23, 17:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 19:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by locoguano - 2013-05-24, 04:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 17:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 19:01
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-28, 17:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-28, 22:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 23:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 00:04
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-29, 00:03
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 01:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 01:53
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 02:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 04:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 07:03
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-30, 03:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-30, 22:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-02, 23:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 00:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 04:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 07:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 16:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-04, 07:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-04, 16:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-06-04, 08:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-06-04, 15:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-06-04, 23:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 17:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-06, 21:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ppilot - 2013-06-06, 21:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 21:54
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 22:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:15
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 04:22
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 08:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-06-13, 21:52
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-07, 06:41
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 06:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 01:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 22:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-09, 05:41
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by grimevil - 2013-06-14, 10:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by carmeli - 2013-06-16, 15:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-16, 16:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-16, 17:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-06-17, 03:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-17, 17:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-17, 18:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-17, 18:30
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-18, 12:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-06-18, 23:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by skcubrats - 2013-06-19, 19:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-24, 17:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by zombieagain - 2013-07-01, 22:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-02, 04:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-03, 12:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-07-06, 17:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-07-15, 00:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-15, 17:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by avus m3 - 2013-07-17, 02:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 02:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 20:32
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 21:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-07-23, 19:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 19:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-07-23, 22:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 23:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-24, 05:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-24, 06:19
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-24, 23:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 22:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by totalhavoc - 2013-07-17, 23:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 23:10
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-23, 23:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 02:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-26, 03:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-26, 20:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-25, 14:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 16:57
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-07-25, 20:28
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kevinb77 - 2013-07-26, 00:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-26, 15:50
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-26, 21:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-28, 20:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-05, 18:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ascagnel - 2013-08-05, 20:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 06:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 21:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 22:46
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-06, 09:16
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 15:32
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 22:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-07, 17:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-08-12, 21:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dreamscape86 - 2013-08-13, 02:46
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-13, 02:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by doublea - 2013-08-13, 18:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 19:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by opdenkamp - 2013-08-13, 20:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 20:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-13, 21:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-14, 08:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-23, 08:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by apollo753 - 2013-10-27, 19:08
Home
Search
Help
Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
Why not WMC as backend?11