2014-01-29, 17:19
(2014-01-28, 14:42)jammyb Wrote: Why would you put media on the disk? You bung the OS on it and stream from your NAS/server or even USB attached drives.It adds an extra box (cost, noise, maintenance, etc.) and a little lag. For light to moderate use with at most 2TB of files needed to be shared within the home (current max for 2.5" drive), an NUC can serve as both an HTPC and a NAS. Sure for heavier use of where more advanced server functionality is needed, you need a separate NAS or server.
(2014-01-28, 17:04)chaseme Wrote: There must be hundreds of posts about people wishing the NUCs had a 2.5" over mSATA before this one... and your wishing this particular one had mSATA?!I was one of these people, but I was waiting for mSATA + 2.5", not 2.5" instead of mSATA.
(2014-01-28, 17:06)JasonHoffman Wrote: The design of this NUC model is all about driving the overall cost down. Having both SATA and mSATA support would raise the price. That's also the reason you get only one HDMI port and no DisplayPort. This design is the low-cost, entry level, HTPC and/or workstation model.Agreed that the price is impressively low. Although I'm sure it would only cost a few cents to wire up the SATA on the chip to the mini PCI express slot for dual mSATA use.
Quote:That being said, my ideal usage model for an HTPC is a NUC with both mSATA and internal SATA support. That way I can run my OS on the mSATA and have a large, cheap platter SATA drive for media and recorded TV storage. For that you'll want the i3 board in the tall case (releasing very soon). It gives you the best of both worlds.Good to know thanks!
Jason