Posts: 1,256
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation:
29
h.udo
Is a huge ABBA fan
Posts: 1,256
My point exactly... if xbmc-live scripts don't work without xinit and x11-xserver-utils, why aren't they a xbmc-live dependency?
Any good reason?
hudo
Posts: 1,456
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
7
ask the developers
my personal understanding: sometimes too much dependencies can screw up your whole distribution system, that's why you intend to use less dependencies rather than too much
Posts: 1,722
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
20
X11-server-utils is not available as a package to install without selection of "basic ubuntu server" on installation.
Posts: 1,256
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation:
29
h.udo
Is a huge ABBA fan
Posts: 1,256
2010-08-26, 20:02
(This post was last modified: 2010-08-26, 20:10 by h.udo.)
Something is wrong...
I always start installation of my machines with ubuntu minimal iso. I never choose "basic ubuntu server" on install. Apart from OpenSSH server, everything I choose is vanilla install from minimal iso... and x11-xserver-utils *is* available on 32 and 64bits.
Either way, the dependencies - apparently - should be corrected.
***EDIT***
I'm currently running xbmc on a M3N78-EM, BE-2350 CPU, 2GB RAM, 2x1TB HDD, 2xHVR-4000 DVB-S2, etc, running on top of Lucid 32bits and an Asrock 330 running Lucid 64bits...
Posts: 1,756
Joined: Feb 2006
I dont install basic ubuntu server simply cause its not a option if you choose expert cli install (see signature)
I can install any deps simply because the sources are set.
Its almost idiot proof.
Posts: 744
Joined: Oct 2006
Reputation:
14
yay!
version numbers sorted out for latest svn dharma beta 1 version
apt-get update -> dist-upgrade works perfectly!
Posts: 1,722
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
20
Ppa is working for me. Just updated last night.
Posts: 28
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
0
Anyone knows if SVN PPA will get Ubuntu Maverick (10.10) binaries before the official Maverick release?