(2014-04-27, 05:30)Traker1001 Wrote: Something small I found out, though, I have been using the quartz skin and trying to simplify things. One of the things I did was delete movies category and rename the TV Shows category to Videos in effort to more or less combine the 2 into a single category on the menu. Well After I renamed the TV Shows to Category, It shows Videos on the screen, But still reads TV shows. Is there an XML File I need to change to get it to read as Just Videos or am I missing something?
You probably want to look at the sources.xml file. On my system it is found at /storage/.xbmc/userdata/sources.xml
I set my video sources up once and forgot about them, so I am not sure how one would go about doing what you want via the GUI, but the sources.xml file lets you specify multiple sources for a given name, like so:
Code:
<source>
<name>TV Shows</name>
<path pathversion="1">/storage/tvshows/</path>
<path pathversion="1">smb://HAPPYSAMBA/media/video/TV/</path>
</source>
It sounds like you might just need to edit the name of a source and perhaps move some <path> elements from one source into another. Be aware your changes probably won't take affect until you restart xbmc.
(2014-04-27, 05:30)Traker1001 Wrote: I will be loading OpenElec and the Httpd onto a intel NUC that I have to see if I can help you guys out on some of the testing. Do you think my Celeron Nuc with 2gb ram can handle the speech and the xbmc. I would think, since the pi is capable of it, but then again pi is completely different architecture. Would it be better for me to test Openelec Gotham or Frodo? I have been generally sticking to Gotham since they are so painfully close to public release.
I'm sure the NUC will run xbmc and handle speech just fine. It may choke on HD video, but for the XBMC GUI, I'd be very surprised if it even breaks a sweat.
I'd go for Gotham, too.
Also, you said you'd be loading the httpd onto the NUC. I think you may be confused about this particular speech backend. For this backend, there are two separate components. There's the "ttsd" backend that you select from the XBMC TTS configuration section as the default TTS engine, and then there's the server "httpttsd" that you run on a windows computer on your local network. The ttsd backend sends the text to the server, tells it the voice and speed to use, and it sends back a wav file for XBMC TTS to play.
(2014-04-27, 05:30)Traker1001 Wrote: Just a thought, At least with a X86 architecture, I wonder if some like this Sapi/Wine see: http://code.google.com/p/open-sapi Combo wouldn't be better and more stable than running a Httpd setup? Not that i know if the sapi/wine is even stable in the first place.
That is an interesting project, but it sounds like it's not as stable as they'd like yet. Given it hooks into the gnome speech dispatcher, and that's already a supported backend for XBMC TTS, there's (theoretically) nothing stopping people using it now if they have the time and patience to set it up.
httpttsd hasn't had any stability problems for me, so far, but I literally only wrote it a couple of weeks ago, so it's still new and needs wider testing, but it's pretty basic and I don't foresee any major issues.
As for "better", that ultimately would come down to your personal home setup. For me, since I have a windows machine on the same network running 24/7, it's probably better to run httpttsd on it and use that. If I just had a linux box running XBMC, then sapi for wine would probably be better than running a virtual windows machine on the same server just to run httpttsd.
(2014-04-27, 05:30)Traker1001 Wrote: I also came across this which is fascinating.
https://www.cepstral.com/forums/viewtopi...=2&t=84724
And the Demo voice http://www.cepstral.com/en/demos
I saw that, too. I was contemplating contacting them to see if I could get a trial copy of that voice to create a backend for it, but haven't gotten around to it. I've used Cepstral voices before and they provide a simple command line utility called "swift", so creating a new backend for it should be fairly trivial as it'd differ very little from existing backends like flite, espeak and pico2wave.
Good luck with the NUC. Please don't hesitate to let me know if you notice any bugs or other issues with the httpttsd server.