New JPEG encoder discussion
#6
Kempniu Wrote:I've already switched to jpeg-turbo some time ago. It was quite an improvement.

Regarding the original pull request, feel free to close it if you wish. As I've mentioned above, I'm still sticking with my patch anyway - most of my folders contain several hundred 12 Mpix images, so I can't afford waiting 5 minutes for thumbnail generation. I guess Atom simply can't do any better. My opinion would probably be quite different if I owned an i5.

The number one reason I recently retired my Atom (Revo 1600) and built an inexpensive XBMC HTPC is because it was so painfully slow when viewing my photos.
Photography is a big hobby of mine and like you I have hundreds of fairly large jpg files in folders.

(BTW, the htpc I built uses an AMD A4-3400 w/windows 7 and scrolling through hundreds of pictures is pretty much instant and there is basically no waiting for thumbnails render. As I scroll down they are there.)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
New JPEG encoder discussion - by Kempniu - 2012-01-06, 12:49
[No subject] - by theuni - 2012-01-07, 01:10
[No subject] - by Kempniu - 2012-01-07, 10:58
[No subject] - by theuni - 2012-01-07, 18:08
[No subject] - by Kempniu - 2012-01-09, 11:21
[No subject] - by dtviewer - 2012-01-10, 22:41
[No subject] - by Robotica - 2012-01-11, 00:18
[No subject] - by bharath23 - 2012-02-14, 23:43
[No subject] - by jmarshall - 2012-02-15, 00:27
[No subject] - by davilla - 2012-02-15, 05:50
[No subject] - by bharath23 - 2012-02-16, 00:00
Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
New JPEG encoder discussion0