2012-04-05, 10:26
(2012-04-05, 10:15)MatsF Wrote:(2012-04-05, 09:16)amet Wrote: we have said that centralizing the addon_data is not a good idea and that it might fail, and you still want to do it, you are on your own I am afraid ...
I don't understand. Who are "we"? I thought that XBMC supported centralizing addon_data, is that not correct?
never heard of anyone trying to centralize addon data, nor did I hear any team members advising that it would be a good idea. correct me if I am wrong.
there is more than one issue with multiple instances of XBMC opening the same files that are in there, my opinion is that it shouldn't be done.
besides, this has nothing to do with this addon, if the pathsubstitution is not handeled correctly then its a XBMC core issue but I think what you are seeing is just the incosistent logging... we save and open from a same location "sub_temp" in "__profile__ = xbmc.translatePath( __addon__.getAddonInfo('profile') ).decode("utf-8")"
