Why not WMC as backend?

Why not WMC as backend?

tcs2tx
Newbie

Posts: 2
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 0

tcs2tx
Newbie
Posts: 2

#211

2013-04-19, 00:48

krustyreturns,

Like others, I am happy that I found this thread. I can't tell you how many times I have reconfigured my setup with servers, clients and tuners trying to arrive at what it appears you are close to achieving. With the release of Frodo, I was looking forward to migrating away from MCE, but after testing four different backends, I figured I would be sticking with MCE for a while longer. In my frustration, earlier today I did a search for MCE as a backend for XBMC, Needless to say, I'm very happy to see all that you are accomplishing. Being a constant tinkerer, I'm more than happy to help you track down bugs. To the extent it helps, I am in the US with three different types of tuners - 1 Ceton, 1 HDHR Prime, and 2 HDHR QAM.

Once again, feel free to let me know if you want one more person to test and help troubleshoot.

Messages In This Thread

Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 17:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 18:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 18:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 23:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-05, 00:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jajoflo - 2012-09-05, 02:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-05, 04:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 00:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-06, 01:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by debennett2 - 2013-01-23, 21:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-01-24, 06:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 02:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-10-29, 05:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-10-29, 16:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-06, 04:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by joebrady - 2012-09-06, 05:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-18, 15:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-21, 01:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-23, 17:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-23, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kreeturez - 2012-09-24, 00:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-24, 00:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-24, 01:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-24, 01:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 15:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-26, 16:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 17:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-27, 10:26

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-09-27, 12:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-01, 04:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-10-02, 21:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-02, 23:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by DJShadow - 2012-10-12, 19:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ebucha - 2012-10-17, 21:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by benoire - 2012-10-22, 08:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Crimzin - 2012-10-24, 23:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by T800 - 2012-10-25, 08:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by svet-am - 2012-10-29, 15:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2012-10-17, 21:31

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-10-17, 21:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by sub3 - 2012-10-22, 17:39

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-01-24, 17:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-01-24, 19:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-01-31, 16:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-01, 20:35

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-01, 20:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-01, 22:14

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 01:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 19:56

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 20:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 21:08

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 21:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 22:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-03, 20:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-03, 22:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-03, 23:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-03, 23:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Hijo del sol - 2013-02-04, 04:21

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 10:21

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-04, 17:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 18:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-04, 18:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jrichards52081 - 2013-02-05, 04:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-05, 05:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by emveepee - 2013-02-05, 04:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bmn001 - 2013-02-05, 20:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-06, 11:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 18:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-08, 20:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 17:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 18:41

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-06, 18:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 19:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-07, 04:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 21:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-08, 15:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-08, 17:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-08, 20:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-02-09, 16:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-09, 19:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-10, 11:52

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by papreston - 2013-02-10, 15:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2013-02-10, 16:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-10, 16:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-11, 05:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-11, 06:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jrichards52081 - 2013-02-12, 01:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-12, 02:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-11, 13:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-12, 04:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-12, 08:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-12, 14:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-12, 10:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-12, 13:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-13, 05:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 14:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-14, 17:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-02-15, 05:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-15, 05:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 20:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-14, 21:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 17:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-16, 19:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 21:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-02-20, 00:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-20, 03:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-20, 15:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-20, 20:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-21, 02:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-21, 15:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 05:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 05:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 05:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 20:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-12, 21:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 21:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 06:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 08:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 10:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-04, 15:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-03-05, 08:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mrkevbo - 2013-03-10, 23:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-11, 02:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-03-11, 04:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-11, 17:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Tyzing - 2013-03-11, 21:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-12, 10:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-12, 13:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-12, 19:43

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 01:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 03:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 12:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 03:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 04:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 16:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 17:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 19:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-15, 01:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 23:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 12:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-14, 17:24

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 21:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 21:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-14, 00:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-14, 03:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-15, 04:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 04:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-15, 05:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 16:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 07:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-09-22, 15:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Angelscry - 2013-09-22, 15:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 21:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-22, 18:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-18, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-19, 00:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-19, 00:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-19, 16:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 16:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-22, 18:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 01:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ConfusedTA - 2013-03-19, 14:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-19, 21:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-22, 14:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-03-21, 10:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-03-22, 06:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by d3maxt - 2013-03-22, 17:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-23, 02:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 09:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-23, 10:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-23, 17:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 18:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-23, 18:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by username145 - 2013-03-24, 00:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-24, 04:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-24, 23:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-25, 05:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 06:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-25, 16:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-25, 09:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-25, 11:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by VladTepz - 2013-03-25, 12:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 19:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-25, 22:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-26, 17:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-26, 17:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-03-28, 05:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-29, 16:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 19:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-29, 19:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 22:48

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-30, 00:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-30, 18:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-30, 00:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-30, 21:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-30, 11:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by moniker - 2013-03-31, 01:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-03-31, 03:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-04-02, 21:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-04, 10:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by justinobwi - 2013-04-04, 18:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-05, 01:40

Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by tekno - 2013-04-09, 07:56

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-09, 17:26

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-09, 17:49

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-04-10, 04:34

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-10, 16:36

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-04-10, 21:55

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-04-11, 06:48

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-11, 17:01

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-12, 17:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Slappa - 2013-04-09, 13:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-04-10, 05:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-04-10, 23:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-04-15, 16:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MyClosedEyes - 2013-04-17, 05:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by tcs2tx - 2013-04-19, 00:48

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-24, 13:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-24, 16:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-04-24, 20:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-25, 08:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-04-29, 21:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Neebski - 2013-04-30, 18:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-30, 19:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-05-06, 03:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-06, 07:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-06, 13:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-06, 16:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-08, 16:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-08, 16:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 19:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-06, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by micster - 2013-05-06, 21:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-07, 12:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-05-07, 15:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-07, 16:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-05-07, 22:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-08, 20:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-09, 19:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-05-08, 23:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 23:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-10, 00:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-14, 02:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-21, 22:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-12, 20:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-13, 07:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-13, 08:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rap777 - 2013-05-13, 10:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Bladed - 2013-05-21, 01:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Mankix - 2013-05-22, 17:58

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-22, 19:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-22, 20:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-05-22, 23:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-05-23, 00:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 00:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 02:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 04:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 04:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 06:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 09:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 09:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-05-23, 17:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 19:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 21:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by locoguano - 2013-05-24, 04:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 17:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 19:01

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-28, 17:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-28, 19:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-28, 22:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 23:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 00:04

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-29, 00:03

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 01:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 01:53

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 02:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 04:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-29, 05:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 07:03

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-29, 07:30

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-30, 03:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-30, 22:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-02, 23:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 00:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 04:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-03, 08:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 07:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-03, 16:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 16:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-04, 07:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-04, 16:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-06-04, 08:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-06-04, 15:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-06-04, 23:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 17:25

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-06, 19:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-06, 21:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ppilot - 2013-06-06, 21:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 21:54

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 22:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:15

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 04:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 08:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-08, 05:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-06-13, 21:52

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-07, 06:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 06:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-08, 01:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 01:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 22:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-09, 05:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by grimevil - 2013-06-14, 10:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by carmeli - 2013-06-16, 15:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-16, 16:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-16, 17:55

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-16, 18:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-06-17, 03:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-17, 17:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-17, 18:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-17, 18:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-18, 04:37

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-18, 12:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-06-18, 23:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-19, 01:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-19, 07:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by skcubrats - 2013-06-19, 19:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-20, 07:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-24, 06:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-24, 17:28

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-24, 18:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by zombieagain - 2013-07-01, 22:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-02, 03:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-02, 04:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-03, 12:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-06, 05:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-07-06, 17:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-06, 19:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-08, 05:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-07-15, 00:51

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-15, 02:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-15, 17:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by avus m3 - 2013-07-17, 02:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 02:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 20:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 21:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-07-23, 19:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 19:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-07-23, 22:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 23:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-24, 05:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-24, 06:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-24, 23:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 22:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by totalhavoc - 2013-07-17, 23:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 23:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-23, 23:22

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-23, 23:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 02:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-26, 03:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-26, 20:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-25, 14:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 16:57

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-07-25, 20:28

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kevinb77 - 2013-07-26, 00:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-26, 15:50

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-26, 21:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-28, 19:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-28, 20:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-05, 18:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ascagnel - 2013-08-05, 20:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 04:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 06:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 18:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 21:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 21:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 22:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-06, 09:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 15:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 22:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-07, 00:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-07, 17:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-12, 20:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-08-12, 21:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-12, 21:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-12, 22:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-12, 23:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 19:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 19:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by feerlessleadr - 2013-08-12, 23:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dreamscape86 - 2013-08-13, 02:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-13, 02:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 02:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by doublea - 2013-08-13, 18:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 21:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 22:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 00:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-14, 07:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 19:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 20:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by opdenkamp - 2013-08-13, 20:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 20:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 21:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-13, 21:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 00:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-14, 08:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 01:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-23, 08:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by apollo753 - 2013-10-27, 19:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-10-27, 23:37

Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help