Why not WMC as backend?

Why not WMC as backend?

JeffreyF
Junior Member

Posts: 33
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 0

JeffreyF
Junior Member
Posts: 33

#304

2013-06-07, 08:26

(2013-06-07, 04:44)Sojhinn Wrote:
(2013-06-07, 04:22)JeffreyF Wrote: Yeah, that's what we're fighting.

My programming is rusty but Jeff check this site out: http://blog.unhandledexception.net/save-...se-buffer/

Maybe there is a way to access the buffer to create your own recording?

Krusty already creates his own recording, we're just getting it to play back while it's being written to. Making some good progress, but I'm going on vacation to Cancun this Saturday (graduation gift!) and I won't be able to work on it there. Probably won't be willing, either. Wink

Wink

Krusty can let you guys know what's going on until I return!

Messages In This Thread

Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 17:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 18:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 18:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 23:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-05, 00:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jajoflo - 2012-09-05, 02:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-05, 04:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 00:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-06, 01:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by debennett2 - 2013-01-23, 21:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-01-24, 06:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 02:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-10-29, 05:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-10-29, 16:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-06, 04:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by joebrady - 2012-09-06, 05:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-18, 15:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-21, 01:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-23, 17:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-23, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kreeturez - 2012-09-24, 00:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-24, 00:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-24, 01:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-24, 01:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 15:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-26, 16:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 17:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-27, 10:26

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-09-27, 12:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-01, 04:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-10-02, 21:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-02, 23:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by DJShadow - 2012-10-12, 19:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ebucha - 2012-10-17, 21:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by benoire - 2012-10-22, 08:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Crimzin - 2012-10-24, 23:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by T800 - 2012-10-25, 08:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by svet-am - 2012-10-29, 15:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2012-10-17, 21:31

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-10-17, 21:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by sub3 - 2012-10-22, 17:39

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-01-24, 17:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-01-24, 19:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-01-31, 16:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-01, 20:35

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-01, 20:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-01, 22:14

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 01:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 19:56

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 20:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 21:08

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 21:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 22:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-03, 20:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-03, 22:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-03, 23:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-03, 23:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Hijo del sol - 2013-02-04, 04:21

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 10:21

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-04, 17:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 18:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-04, 18:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jrichards52081 - 2013-02-05, 04:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-05, 05:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by emveepee - 2013-02-05, 04:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bmn001 - 2013-02-05, 20:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-06, 11:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 18:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-08, 20:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 17:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 18:41

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-06, 18:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 19:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-07, 04:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 21:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-08, 15:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-08, 17:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-08, 20:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-02-09, 16:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-09, 19:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-10, 11:52

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by papreston - 2013-02-10, 15:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2013-02-10, 16:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-10, 16:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-11, 05:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-11, 06:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jrichards52081 - 2013-02-12, 01:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-12, 02:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-11, 13:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-12, 04:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-12, 08:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-12, 14:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-12, 10:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-12, 13:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-13, 05:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 14:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-14, 17:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-02-15, 05:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-15, 05:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 20:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-14, 21:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 17:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-16, 19:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 21:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-02-20, 00:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-20, 03:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-20, 15:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-20, 20:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-21, 02:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-21, 15:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 05:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 05:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 05:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 20:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-12, 21:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 21:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 06:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 08:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 10:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-04, 15:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-03-05, 08:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mrkevbo - 2013-03-10, 23:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-11, 02:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-03-11, 04:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-11, 17:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Tyzing - 2013-03-11, 21:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-12, 10:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-12, 13:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-12, 19:43

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 01:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 03:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 12:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 03:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 04:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 16:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 17:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 19:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-15, 01:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 23:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 12:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-14, 17:24

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 21:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 21:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-14, 00:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-14, 03:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-15, 04:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 04:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-15, 05:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 16:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 07:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-09-22, 15:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Angelscry - 2013-09-22, 15:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 21:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-22, 18:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-18, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-19, 00:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-19, 00:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-19, 16:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 16:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-22, 18:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 01:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ConfusedTA - 2013-03-19, 14:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-19, 21:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-22, 14:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-03-21, 10:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-03-22, 06:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by d3maxt - 2013-03-22, 17:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-23, 02:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 09:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-23, 10:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-23, 17:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 18:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-23, 18:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by username145 - 2013-03-24, 00:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-24, 04:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-24, 23:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-25, 05:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 06:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-25, 16:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-25, 09:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-25, 11:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by VladTepz - 2013-03-25, 12:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 19:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-25, 22:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-26, 17:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-26, 17:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-03-28, 05:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-29, 16:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 19:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-29, 19:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 22:48

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-30, 00:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-30, 18:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-30, 00:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-30, 21:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-30, 11:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by moniker - 2013-03-31, 01:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-03-31, 03:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-04-02, 21:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-04, 10:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by justinobwi - 2013-04-04, 18:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-05, 01:40

Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by tekno - 2013-04-09, 07:56

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-09, 17:26

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-09, 17:49

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-04-10, 04:34

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-10, 16:36

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-04-10, 21:55

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-04-11, 06:48

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-11, 17:01

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-12, 17:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Slappa - 2013-04-09, 13:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-04-10, 05:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-04-10, 23:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-04-15, 16:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MyClosedEyes - 2013-04-17, 05:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by tcs2tx - 2013-04-19, 00:48

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-24, 13:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-24, 16:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-04-24, 20:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-25, 08:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-04-29, 21:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Neebski - 2013-04-30, 18:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-30, 19:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-05-06, 03:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-06, 07:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-06, 13:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-06, 16:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-08, 16:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-08, 16:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 19:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-06, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by micster - 2013-05-06, 21:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-07, 12:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-05-07, 15:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-07, 16:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-05-07, 22:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-08, 20:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-09, 19:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-05-08, 23:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 23:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-10, 00:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-14, 02:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-21, 22:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-12, 20:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-13, 07:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-13, 08:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rap777 - 2013-05-13, 10:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Bladed - 2013-05-21, 01:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Mankix - 2013-05-22, 17:58

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-22, 19:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-22, 20:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-05-22, 23:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-05-23, 00:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 00:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 02:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 04:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 04:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 06:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 09:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 09:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-05-23, 17:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 19:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 21:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by locoguano - 2013-05-24, 04:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 17:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 19:01

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-28, 17:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-28, 19:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-28, 22:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 23:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 00:04

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-29, 00:03

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 01:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 01:53

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 02:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 04:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-29, 05:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 07:03

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-29, 07:30

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-30, 03:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-30, 22:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-02, 23:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 00:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 04:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-03, 08:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 07:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-03, 16:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 16:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-04, 07:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-04, 16:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-06-04, 08:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-06-04, 15:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-06-04, 23:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 17:25

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-06, 19:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-06, 21:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ppilot - 2013-06-06, 21:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 21:54

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 22:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:15

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 04:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 08:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-08, 05:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-06-13, 21:52

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-07, 06:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 06:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-08, 01:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 01:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 22:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-09, 05:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by grimevil - 2013-06-14, 10:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by carmeli - 2013-06-16, 15:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-16, 16:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-16, 17:55

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-16, 18:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-06-17, 03:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-17, 17:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-17, 18:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-17, 18:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-18, 04:37

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-18, 12:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-06-18, 23:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-19, 01:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-19, 07:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by skcubrats - 2013-06-19, 19:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-20, 07:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-24, 06:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-24, 17:28

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-24, 18:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by zombieagain - 2013-07-01, 22:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-02, 03:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-02, 04:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-03, 12:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-06, 05:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-07-06, 17:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-06, 19:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-08, 05:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-07-15, 00:51

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-15, 02:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-15, 17:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by avus m3 - 2013-07-17, 02:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 02:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 20:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 21:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-07-23, 19:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 19:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-07-23, 22:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 23:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-24, 05:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-24, 06:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-24, 23:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 22:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by totalhavoc - 2013-07-17, 23:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 23:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-23, 23:22

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-23, 23:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 02:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-26, 03:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-26, 20:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-25, 14:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 16:57

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-07-25, 20:28

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kevinb77 - 2013-07-26, 00:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-26, 15:50

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-26, 21:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-28, 19:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-28, 20:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-05, 18:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ascagnel - 2013-08-05, 20:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 04:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 06:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 18:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 21:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 21:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 22:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-06, 09:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 15:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 22:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-07, 00:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-07, 17:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-12, 20:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-08-12, 21:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-12, 21:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-12, 22:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-12, 23:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 19:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 19:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by feerlessleadr - 2013-08-12, 23:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dreamscape86 - 2013-08-13, 02:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-13, 02:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 02:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by doublea - 2013-08-13, 18:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 21:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 22:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 00:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-14, 07:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 19:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 20:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by opdenkamp - 2013-08-13, 20:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 20:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 21:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-13, 21:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 00:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-14, 08:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 01:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-23, 08:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by apollo753 - 2013-10-27, 19:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-10-27, 23:37

Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help