Posts: 31,445
Joined: Jan 2011
2012-11-19, 03:01
(This post was last modified: 2012-11-19, 03:03 by Ned Scott.)
gibxxi,
Your NAS device can handle XBMC and an army of ready nas plug-ins. If it couldn't handle Plex then Plex is doing something really stupid (which would not surprise me at all). Wimpy ARM processors can do everything a ReadyNAS can do and more, plus run XBMC (a full version of XBMC, with the GUI), so there's no way those Intel Atom processors can't also do it. It's not hacky, it's not complicated.
Not only this, but you guys don't even know that much about UPnP. There are so many possibilities and options just within the UPnP protocol, let alone adding XBMC specific stuff into the mix like JSON-RPC.
So here's what's happening: one day we will murder MySQL in the streets and film it. That's happening, no if's, and's or but's. We will replace it with something better. The people who are doing this are the people who brought you the XBMC you know and love, so have a little faith in them.
Posts: 31,445
Joined: Jan 2011
XBMC can run without a GUI. It's still early in support/development, but people actually have headless XBMC versions running now:
http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=132919
Posts: 6,564
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation:
160
natethomas
Enjoying Retirement by Staying Busy
Posts: 6,564
It's nice that we've already got things to shoot for in XBMC Ganymede (or whatever we end up calling it).
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
@ natethomas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bib...ing_with_G
Since XBMC was naming releases based on biblical stuff
Offtopic I know but I wanted to bring that list to your attention.
uNi
Posts: 26,215
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation:
187
I'm intrigued at the sunday school where you learnt all about Atlantis, Camelot, and Dharma :p
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
2012-11-21, 00:55
(This post was last modified: 2012-11-21, 00:58 by un1versal.)
There was a Babylon 9.04 - that's biblical, Probably what I had in my head when I posted that.
But for G in the same lines as the releases you mentioned. Mythological places and whatnot then maybe Gihon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:My...cal_rivers
Atlantis
Babylon
Camelot
Dharma
Eden
Frodo
Gihon
I never had Sunday school, ;p hehehe.
uNi
Posts: 942
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
64
gibxxi
Posting Freak
Posts: 942
2012-11-22, 02:12
(This post was last modified: 2012-11-22, 02:13 by gibxxi.)
Well there IS a SDK available for packaging add-ons for the ReadyNAS in a way that they can be administered directly from the NAS Frontview UI. My Referall to "hackery" was not in ANY way deriding the XBMC software or the way it's programmed.
However, while Netgear make excellent hardware, the same can't always be said for software they place on these devices. As a lot of people who've ever owned anything by Netgear (not just a ReadyNAS) will tell you.
The version of Linux on the ReadyNAS Ultra is Sarge/Etch. Old enough to cause issues with software that requires later libraries. And it's not simply just a case in "set-it-and-forget-it". It requires SSH'ing into the box and manipulating the system directly, which may (or may not) have other consequences.
An add-on developer on the ReadyNAS forums may package up a future version of XBMC for use with the NAS, and if he/she doesn't I'll look at it myself. If ultimately I fail in this, I'll do things differently. I just don't see the need to pull something that isn't a risk in the first place.
I came from MCE, via MediaPortal. XBMC is and always WILL be the first choice of media center for me. And I do know what I'm doing with my hardware, having been doing PC work for 18 years. It's just slightly unnerving to have to start doing things that are potentially dangerous to your primary data store. But I have other plans in motion which may see me secure a second NAS unit dedicated to the HTPC setup i'm running, so this might not be such an issue as originally thought.
Posts: 693
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
17
If XBMC were to become the de-facto UPnP server on commercial NAS would be a great thing, might help clean up the mess of DLNA devices too if it's the server companies test their products against. NAS makers could also save themselves a bit of money by not having to license commercial software that does this or their customers having to mess with custom UPnP/DLNA servers.
QNAP announced on their forums they will be doing a build of XBMC for their x86 NAS following Thecus who also have a version, these models have a HDMI output so you can get video from them but hopefully they can be persuaded once everything is in place to adopt is as the media server out of the box on all their models.