2015-02-19, 21:47
(2015-02-19, 20:20)Lunatixz Wrote:(2015-02-19, 19:58)xexe Wrote: I dont mind time consuming but it seems with my library size (very very large) it gets bogged down. It just hit 10% so thats 4% more in 1.25 hours.
My problem is everyone is going to use "Auto" on their first try when literally everything about the addon is new to them hence my suggestions that some "quick try on first boot" makes sense. I freely admit though I am an edge case.
What I will do is remove that addon and start again this time not choosing autotune as it doesnt feel right for me to be commenting here on an addon ive never managed to get to the point of using yet.
Hmm, I'm going to guess you didn't read my reply to you?...
Because this post does nothing more then repeat your initial complaint, it does not mention any of the possible remedies I suggested to you.
I'm guessing you aren't happy with the answers I gave you before? I reduced initial autotuning as you requested, and instructed you how to help troubleshoot why your parsing times are so long...
Sorry I must simply not be following what your saying. I have zero issues with the addon just saying I have no right to comment at all since I haven't made it run yet because the autotune option is very slow for me.
Keep in mind I have zero experience with the addon and every term you mention is completely new to me.
The way I read your post was that "I should not run autotune" but rather manually setup some sample channels which is what I am endevouring to do by removing and reinstalling (since as it stands it just keeps tryign to autotune). I have just cancelled auto tune at 19% as it would easily take all night at current rate.
Certainly my issue will be the large dbase I have
