[drinfernoo]

Ok, so I would need to keep the original shotcut group in the root of the groups also. I see, so when i sent a shortcut group to another group it it doesnt copy it, it links it correct? So I need to keep the original there. I was thinking i could delete the original after i sent it to another shortcut group so theres not a mess of groups. 

Correct, it just links to whatever the shortcut was for, so removing the group would break the shortcut.

I certainly like the idea of making shortcut groups more flexible in that way, but it would probably require a substantial part of the logic behind how groups are added and stored to be overhauled. I'm trying to come up with a good way to handle it if I ever decide to go down that path in the future. 

Sounds good. Dont let me sway you off your intended path on this. I appreciate the functionality of what you created already. Maybe it would make more sense if somebody took a look at Superfavorites and tried to fix that instead, but i think the code is pretty complicated.

I don't think Super Favorites is really a viable option for the future (or the present, for that matter), for most users. It's been broken and patched many, many times, and is not anywhere close to being "maintainable" any longer, in my opinion.

That being said, my hope is that this will eventually become a "replacement" of sorts, but I believe I'm still a fair bit away from "feature parity". There are a couple of features from Super Favorites I likely won't attempt to replicate, but things like nested groups are now something on my roadmap, thanks to your request

I've actually been thinking over it today, and have a really neat idea for how the widgets would work, once that comes down the line