2008-12-21, 20:49
so everyone agrees Vista MCE beats XBMC in terms of quality? I can hardly notice any difference...
junk Wrote:so everyone agrees Vista MCE beats XBMC in terms of quality? I can hardly notice any difference...
junk Wrote:so everyone agrees Vista MCE beats XBMC in terms of quality? I can hardly notice any difference...
ashlar Wrote:LaTropa, read this http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=40264
Also, lower CPU load does not equate with better quality. Even if your CPU has a load average at 80%, what is important is that it doesn't spike too high, causing you to lose frames.
You should frame by frame comparisons of the same material decoded by DVDplayer (the media player in XBMC) and your standard Windows player, with CoreAVC. Then you could tell which player gives you better quality with x264 content.
junk Wrote:(Forgive a n00bNothing. That's the goal of developers. Unless I'm seriously mistaken.
Or why not make the embedded codecs be the best codecs? What am I missing?
junk Wrote:(Forgive a n00b
Or why not make the embedded codecs be the best codecs? What am I missing?