[J_K_M_A_N]

This is a problem, I agree, but it's non-trivial to display this sort of thing in the user interface, given that one has to allow nested ands within ors or ors within ands and so on. For example,

{rule1} OR {rule2} OR {rule3} AND {rule4}

might be interpreted by some as "at least one of rule 1, 2, or 3 is holds, and rule 4 also must hold" whereas in reality it's "at least one of rule 1, rule 2, or the combination of rule 3 and rule4 must hold".

That's why I chose to go the easy way out: You only get ors or ands in a single filter, but you can combine filters.

Now, one way to improve on this is allowing more scope in a single rule. For instance, we could combat your situation quite well, as the or's are all on the one field, so the 3 rules you have could be combined into a single rule via some sort of multiple select on the genres. Then you combine that rule (via AND) with your watched rule and you're done.

You can't handle all cases in this way though - ideas most welcome

Cheers,
Jonathan

I think that is the problem. There is no good way (that I can think of) to handle things like that. It could group in different ways. I think that it works fine with the smartplaylist though.

It would just be nice to be able to name the smartplaylist whatever you want AND make it show up in a different section (maybe from a dropdown or something). For instance, you could make a smartplaylist that groups the movies together (like die hard) and tell the playlist to list in the movies->titles section and name it die hard series or something like that. I think that may take care of some of the grouping issues that Gamester17 was talking about. But you could also make a smart playlist that grouped genre's and list them somewhere. Then you wouldn't need to have that listing. It could be a smartplaylist instead.

Just an idea.

J_K_M_A_N