2009-06-15, 09:48
gnif Wrote:Nope, the problem has nothing to do with matching the FPS... I have found the issue and fixed it...
http://trac.xbmc.org/ticket/6761
This is huge, gonna try it later when i come home.
Good work gnif!
//M
This is huge, gonna try it later when i come home.
Good work gnif!
//M
2009-06-15, 18:41
Verified!
Updated to latest SVN. The GUI is now running smooth, at correct FPS.
Good work gnif!
Updated to latest SVN. The GUI is now running smooth, at correct FPS.
Good work gnif!
2009-06-15, 19:02
Verified too. r21070 runs perfect, even on VC1!
(But still 30fps in menu (set to 60Hz) - I still think, this is correct in fact of the progressive/interlaced-thing)
Regards,
Patrick
(But still 30fps in menu (set to 60Hz) - I still think, this is correct in fact of the progressive/interlaced-thing)
Regards,
Patrick
2009-06-16, 09:18
pat1975 Wrote:Verified too. r21070 runs perfect, even on VC1!
(But still 30fps in menu (set to 60Hz) - I still think, this is correct in fact of the progressive/interlaced-thing)
Regards,
Patrick
No, GUI should work as well @ 60Hz = 60fps, at least it does so for me. Try cycling your resolutions set in XBMC ( - change res and change back).
Ditch the "safefull" hacks. Remove the old SVN, do a clean checkout. Remove your .xbmc folder in homedir.
It should work for you..
2009-06-16, 12:38
Perhaps that should be updated in the interface, the Hz suffix is inappropriate, and I think the reason this problem caused so much confusion in the first place, it should be FPS... the output it always going to be @ X Hz, but the rendering rate may vary from machine to machine, esp if VSYNC is turned off.
