2010-02-01, 15:16
Hi.
I am debating whether this represents a bug or not?
I have a separate folder for each movie as recommended. I have exported (multiple files) the library back to the NAS and exported actor thumbs. So the NAS now has for each movie...
moviename
|
|------- .actors
| |----- actor1.tbn
| |----- actor2.tbn
|
|------- movie.avi
|------- movie.nfo
|------- movie.tbn
|------- movie-fanart.jpg
When the scraper scans this structure, it attempts a lookup of the .actors folder (which fails). However - it does this on every library update... this is a loooong process.
NOTE - I have both "scan recursively" and "folder name contains movie name" options selected - but I don't think this should be an issue since the UI allows both options to be selected?
At the moment, I have deleted the .actors subfolders throughout the NAS share - but shouldn't .actors be excluded from the update?
Thanks, J.
I am debating whether this represents a bug or not?
I have a separate folder for each movie as recommended. I have exported (multiple files) the library back to the NAS and exported actor thumbs. So the NAS now has for each movie...
moviename
|
|------- .actors
| |----- actor1.tbn
| |----- actor2.tbn
|
|------- movie.avi
|------- movie.nfo
|------- movie.tbn
|------- movie-fanart.jpg
When the scraper scans this structure, it attempts a lookup of the .actors folder (which fails). However - it does this on every library update... this is a loooong process.
NOTE - I have both "scan recursively" and "folder name contains movie name" options selected - but I don't think this should be an issue since the UI allows both options to be selected?
At the moment, I have deleted the .actors subfolders throughout the NAS share - but shouldn't .actors be excluded from the update?
Thanks, J.