Posts: 39
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
0
dzan
Junior Member
Posts: 39
Hi all,
I'm new to the forum. I'm planning on building a HTPC soon and I was wondering: is there linux support for the 'power' of the new Clarckdale processors ( igp )? I read they were so great for HTPC's and a GPU is no longer needed but is this true for one who uses linux too?
I'd go for a 'stronger' clarckdale without gpu if it's true. ( i5... ) but if not I would go for a slow, cheap, efficient gpu ( amd one probably ) with a nvidia gpu so I can use VDPAU..
Need some help here. The CPU only option is preferred if someone can guaranty me it plays all hd content I throw at it. ( I read getting audio over the hdmi out is trouble.. but I don't care about that, i'll hook up the audio seperate then. )
Greets,
dzan
Posts: 1,289
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation:
6
I was in your boat about ready to drop coin on an i3 still plenty powerful from what I have read, but alas I am running Ubuntu and NOT willing to load Windows on my HTPC. so I went with Zotac ionitx-L-E I'll overclock it to 2ghz and it will play anything I throw at it.
since I already have the 4 gigs of DDR3 I can upgrade in the Future should I choose to.
-=Jason=-
Posts: 39
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
0
dzan
Junior Member
Posts: 39
Thanks for the replies yet, but sticking with nvidia until it matures is not an option. If i'd go for nvidia I would buy a cheap lowend cpu/mobo combination and then an upgrade later would be expensive.
Will the i3 play hd content yet or not? Will the i5?
Posts: 1,456
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
7
a) it's "Clarkdale"
b) there's no hardware-assisted GPU HD-decoding available for the integrated IGP, AFAIK not even in windows (yet?)
c) the CPU alone should be capable of doing software-decoding up to 1080p, even the small i3
d) as previous posters said, a fully integrated atom&Ion combo with proper decoding acceleration and HDMI out such as the mentioned zotac IONITX would be a better option
Posts: 39
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
0
dzan
Junior Member
Posts: 39
But I'm not interested in Ion/Atom. I want one of the two options I gave myself. So my question comes down to: someone here uses the i5 core or i3 core? Does it work? Does it play all content?
Btw no support in windows neither? Seems strange.
Greets
Posts: 3,212
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
62
2010-07-22, 01:55
(This post was last modified: 2010-07-22, 01:58 by poofyhairguy.)
No, i3 GPU support sucks in Linux. I can explain more, as I am a Xorg junkie.
Intel used to be the absolute best when it came to open source GPU drivers. Their older GPUs (such as the world's most popular GMA 950) came with excellent open source drivers worked on by the finest minds in that part of the Linux community.
The problem is that on the hardware side Intel's GPU division has proven to be pretty much worthless. They rolled out years of hardware that was barely more powerful than the last generation (see GMA 950 to x3100), and even their best work couldn't properly accelerate x264 like years old Nvidia cards can.
So what did Intel do in their newest integrated GPUs? They gave up. They basically killed the graphics division (the plans for stand alone GPUs have been completely scraped) and instead Intel licensed technology from PowerVR, the company best known for making the Dreamcast GPU.
The problem with PowerVR technology was that much of the technology is covered by patents that aren't allowed to be opensourced. That means that going forward Intel GPUs are basically gonna suck when it comes to Linux support, because they no longer can give everything away in the open drivers.
Now this wouldn't be bad if the closed source drivers that came with the GPUs were good (ala Nvidia) but with the i3 GPUs it is not the case. It is easy to see that Intel is over its head with the licensed technology, and that the failure of its internal GPU department to ever make a competitive GPU on its own will inadvertently make its Linux drivers a minefield of legalities. Linux Xorg developers hate messes like that, so many are moving development efforts to AMD cards because even though AMD won't open source their closed drivers (licensed tech too they say) they have released all the data on the cards needed to write the drivers. Of course that takes some time.
So the answer for most Linux buffs is to use AMD cards where you want an "install and go" experience in Linux.
The answer for us Media Center Linux buffs is to only use Nvidia cards, because even though the drivers are closed Nvidia's linux acceleration technology is literally years ahead of anyone else (including open source AMD driver developers). Once you get into the Xorg community you realize that there is maybe 50 people maximum in the world who have the knowledge to make good display drivers in Linux, and you also realize that at least 20 of those people work for Nvidia.
So stick to what works- Nvidia- and avoid Intel GPUs for the time being....
Posts: 39
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
0
dzan
Junior Member
Posts: 39
Sorry to revive my old thread but does anyone know if the latest linux kernel release changes anything? It states it now has hardware support for h264 and vc2 ( or something ) for Intel G45 chipsets...
Posts: 217
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
0
Supported and "working" aren't always the same. But just fyi, the G45 and the board you picked out are not the same thing.
-Erik
Don't be scared to ask questions. Odds are someone else is wondering the same thing.
Closet - Norco 4020 - Supermicro X8SAX - Intel i7-920 - Corsair HX1000 - Corsair XMS3 12GB - 10x1.5tb Raid 5 - 10x2tb Raid 5 - Openfiler VM inside Workstation Win7 x64
Living room - Silverstone ML02B-MXR - Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H - E8400 - OCZ Platinum Edition 4GB - Denon 3310CI
Bedroom - Antec Mini Skeleton - Zotac IONITX-B-E @ 1.92ghz - AVS Gear HA-IR01SV - A-DATA G series 4GB - Denon 2808CI