2013-05-20, 20:45
I've seen a lot of advocacy for cheap CPUs in an HTPC, since you don't use the processor for much if you're not transcoding. However most of these builders have said they don't want to do any gaming. I'm planning to build an XBMC-Linux HTPC, but I'd also like to use it to play some old emulated games, like SNES, PSX, N64, and maybe PS2.
I'm currently considering and AMD apu or an Intel with HD 4000 graphics (whatever the cheapest one is, I think it's the i3 3225). Here are my concerns:
- I've heard AMD's integrated graphics are much better. I've heard some complaints about drivers for linux, but I've seen enough online by people who have it working (some use older linux versions, that's fine) that I'm not that worried about that.
- AMD doesn't support HD auido on Linux? Is this true? Is it true that Intel does? How much of a difference does this make?
- How relevant is the difference in computing power between these and lower-end CPUs, if I'm not playing current-gen games?
Thanks in advance.
I'm currently considering and AMD apu or an Intel with HD 4000 graphics (whatever the cheapest one is, I think it's the i3 3225). Here are my concerns:
- I've heard AMD's integrated graphics are much better. I've heard some complaints about drivers for linux, but I've seen enough online by people who have it working (some use older linux versions, that's fine) that I'm not that worried about that.
- AMD doesn't support HD auido on Linux? Is this true? Is it true that Intel does? How much of a difference does this make?
- How relevant is the difference in computing power between these and lower-end CPUs, if I'm not playing current-gen games?
Thanks in advance.