"coverJuke" and "PictureFlow", are using two other different ways of doing Cover Flow than the current method used in XBMC.
Are those methods any better (more effective/optimized) or worse (less effective/optimized) than XBMC existing code?
"CoverJuke" and "PictureFlow", two other ways of doing CoverFlow
Team-XBMC Forum Moderator
Joined: Sep 2003
2008-02-15 17:20 "CoverJuke" and "PictureFlow", two other ways of doing CoverFlow Post: #1
Joined: Oct 2003
2008-02-16 00:13 Post: #2
They don't fit in with the skinning engine of XBMC which doesn't force the skinner into a particular style (well, tries not to at least!) but rather allows the skinner to create any layout they want (within the constraints of the engine).
Both of those apps force the layout into the standard coverflow layout.
Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting.
Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules.
For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first.