2009-03-18, 21:22
I've been using XBMC on my Xbox for ages and now that I've *finally* bought an HDTV I'd like to start watching all my HD content on the big screen instead of my 24" monitor. To do so I will need to ditch the old Xbox and build a more competent HTPC.
I've been watching the XBMC-VDPAU branch for the last few weeks with interest and have decided that it's probably best to build a machine geared to support it - these would be nVidia integrated graphics motherboards. There are two choices: AMD and Intel.
The AMD motherboards only have 8200/8300 integrated chipsets, while the Intel boards have the latest 9300/9400 chipsets. Does this make that much of a difference? Motd2k has reported that there are issues with the older 8x00 series and that it is best to avoid them for the time being. Yes, people have reported getting it to work, but at the same time wouldn't it be a better investment to spend the $20 extra and get updated HDMI protocol and a newer audio chipset?
Once you pick a platform you then have to pick a CPU. In this domain I am completely unsure. Yes, AMDs chips generally report a lower maximum wattage, directly leading to cooler temperatures, but you could just as easily underclock an Intel chip and get the same performance/heat ratio.
Also, I'm not sure just how much "punch" you need for XBMC. I imagine modern processors will have enough power to deal with all of the graphical effects (hell my 700MHz P3 Xbox can do it), but I am also considering eventually plugging a TV tuner into my HTPC and creating a VDR. Wouldn't this require a bit more punch than a Celeron or equivalent AMD processor could deliver?
On a side note: I have seen some people say that for HTPCs it is a good idea to get 4GB of RAM if possible. Is this true? Will you see a performance benefit? Again, upgrading from 2GB DDR2 to 4GB DDR2 is fairly cheap, but you pay a heat/power price going with extra RAM.
I'd like to ask for thoughts and opinions, hear what other people have experienced with their builds.
Thank for the help!
I've been watching the XBMC-VDPAU branch for the last few weeks with interest and have decided that it's probably best to build a machine geared to support it - these would be nVidia integrated graphics motherboards. There are two choices: AMD and Intel.
The AMD motherboards only have 8200/8300 integrated chipsets, while the Intel boards have the latest 9300/9400 chipsets. Does this make that much of a difference? Motd2k has reported that there are issues with the older 8x00 series and that it is best to avoid them for the time being. Yes, people have reported getting it to work, but at the same time wouldn't it be a better investment to spend the $20 extra and get updated HDMI protocol and a newer audio chipset?
Once you pick a platform you then have to pick a CPU. In this domain I am completely unsure. Yes, AMDs chips generally report a lower maximum wattage, directly leading to cooler temperatures, but you could just as easily underclock an Intel chip and get the same performance/heat ratio.
Also, I'm not sure just how much "punch" you need for XBMC. I imagine modern processors will have enough power to deal with all of the graphical effects (hell my 700MHz P3 Xbox can do it), but I am also considering eventually plugging a TV tuner into my HTPC and creating a VDR. Wouldn't this require a bit more punch than a Celeron or equivalent AMD processor could deliver?
On a side note: I have seen some people say that for HTPCs it is a good idea to get 4GB of RAM if possible. Is this true? Will you see a performance benefit? Again, upgrading from 2GB DDR2 to 4GB DDR2 is fairly cheap, but you pay a heat/power price going with extra RAM.
I'd like to ask for thoughts and opinions, hear what other people have experienced with their builds.
Thank for the help!