(2016-05-03, 17:33)KILLERNADS Wrote: Is there any major differences between the two? According to the front page, they sound quite similar. The only main differences that i can find is that the Q10 Pro has some early firmware problems that will most likely be fixed with an update. However, the price seems its a lot cheaper for the Q10 Pro. Where the Q10 Pro is i think £150, the Skylake looks to be around £300!

Is the Q10 Pro a better option out of the two? and more future proof etc...

(2016-05-03, 17:54)movie78 Wrote:

(2016-05-03, 17:33)KILLERNADS Wrote:

(2016-05-03, 16:16)movie78 Wrote: I will suggest Himedia Q10 Pro or Intel Skylake NUC

Some BD Menu works in Kodi

Is there any major differences between the two? According to the front page, they sound quite similar. The only main differences that i can find is that the Q10 Pro has some early firmware problems that will most likely be fixed with an update. However, the price seems its a lot cheaper for the Q10 Pro. Where the Q10 Pro is i think £150, the Skylake looks to be around £300!

Is the Q10 Pro a better option out of the two? and more future proof etc...

What is the most important feature for you 1-4 in order?
3D MVC
4K
BD-MENU
NETFLIX UHD

(2016-05-03, 18:53)KILLERNADS Wrote:

(2016-05-03, 17:54)movie78 Wrote:

(2016-05-03, 17:33)KILLERNADS Wrote: Is there any major differences between the two? According to the front page, they sound quite similar. The only main differences that i can find is that the Q10 Pro has some early firmware problems that will most likely be fixed with an update. However, the price seems its a lot cheaper for the Q10 Pro. Where the Q10 Pro is i think £150, the Skylake looks to be around £300!

Is the Q10 Pro a better option out of the two? and more future proof etc...

What is the most important feature for you 1-4 in order?
3D MVC
4K
BD-MENU
NETFLIX UHD

Right, thats a tricky question

4K plus Dolby Atmos / DTSX
3D MVC / Bluray from ISO
Netflix UHD (Ideally would like this but can decide to keep my nvidia shield instead and use this on that)
BD-Menu (not required, so least important but would be good to have)

Thanks!

(2016-05-03, 16:15)hdmkv Wrote: Hmm, I think it should work for MVC. Why not download the latest MVC build, make the proper settings and just try it?

(2016-05-03, 19:04)movie78 Wrote:

(2016-05-03, 18:53)KILLERNADS Wrote:

(2016-05-03, 17:54)movie78 Wrote: What is the most important feature for you 1-4 in order?
3D MVC
4K
BD-MENU
NETFLIX UHD

Right, thats a tricky question

4K plus Dolby Atmos / DTSX
3D MVC / Bluray from ISO
Netflix UHD (Ideally would like this but can decide to keep my nvidia shield instead and use this on that)
BD-Menu (not required, so least important but would be good to have)

Thanks!

4K plus Dolby Atmos / DTSX HIMEDIA Q10 PRO
3D MVC / Bluray from ISO[/b] HIMEDIA Q10 PRO & Intel Base HW w/@afedchin Build (Also DTS:X and ATMOS)
Netflix UHD (Ideally would like this but can decide to keep my nvidia shield instead and use this on that) Nvidia Sheild
BD-Menu (not required, so least important but would be good to have) Some BD-Menu works Intel Base HW w/@afedchin Build

Now the choice is in your hands, I know it's not easy

(2016-05-04, 01:53)hdmkv Wrote: Listen to @Stereodude and do free upgrade to Win10 first . Forgot 'bout that lil' detail.

(2016-05-05, 14:32)SofaKng Wrote: FYI - There appears to be a new test build of Intel MVC for win32: http://mirrors.kodi.tv/test-builds/win32/KodiSetup-20160505-67d7201-msdk_mvc_wip.exe.

(2016-05-05, 18:46)hdmkv Wrote: No. Win 8.x and 10 only.

Quote:Some fans too are complaining that 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray doesn’t have a 3D option, irritated as they rightfully are by the fact that the studios seem to have backed away from regular Blu-ray 3D. But again, there are reasons for this. For one thing, there simply is no 4K 3D material – virtually everything you see projected theatrically in 3D (save for full-IMAX titles) is 2K. And from what I’ve been hearing, the industry pull-back from Blu-ray 3D isn’t being led by the studios, it’s being led by the manufacturers, who went all-in on home 3D for several years only to receive a pretty strong message from consumers at large that they aren’t interested in 3D so long as it requires wearing glasses.

Quote:Now… there is some good news on the home 3D front. For one thing, all of the early Ultra HD Blu-ray players thus far – including Samsung’s launch player, the UDB-K8500 – support regular Blu-ray 3D. What’s more, all of the display manufacturers tell me that while they’re pulling back from 3D on many of their models in the near term, they’re aggressively working on autostereoscopic 3D displays in their labs. When that technology is ready, they’re going to get back into home 3D in a big way. And since Blu-ray 3D is display format-agnostic, it’s quite possible that all of your existing Blu-ray 3D titles will work better than ever on those future glasses-free displays.

(2016-05-08, 15:47)hdmkv Wrote: I find comments about glasses stupid honestly. Went to a totally packed showing of 'Captain America: Civil War' yesterday in IMAX 3D, and while 3D on actual movie was mild-to-medium, most of the audience went "whoa!" when the IMAX 3D countdown bit was shown just before the movie. Manufacturers made mistakes with 3D, and they're doing similar with 4K BD now... stupid pricing, exclusives, poor promotional efforts, confusing tech lingo, etc.