(2016-12-05, 22:56)brazen1 Wrote: Because half SBS is 1920 X 540 which is the best it gets for a 1080 system.

(2016-12-05, 23:06)movie78 Wrote:

(2016-12-05, 22:52)hausmanis Wrote: going from the q10pro to the x9s was probably the worst "upgrade" ive done.

x9s is so much worse than the q10pro acording to me, i got so much lagg, ethernet lost and shit bugs in the x9s its driving my crazy

q10pro is a final product
x9s is in beta

Dunno why anyone would rank x9s higher than q10pro but thats why i thought i made a upgrade buying this bad product that x9s is atm

I agreed with you, I gave my Q10 Pro to my Brother and got X8, now I am scratching my head, want to tell him that I want my device back but I can't.

(2016-12-05, 23:03)timstephens24 Wrote: How do you make a full SBS rip?

(2016-12-05, 23:12)da-anda Wrote:

(2016-12-05, 22:56)brazen1 Wrote: Because half SBS is 1920 X 540 which is the best it gets for a 1080 system.

HSBS is 960x1080 per eye, HTAB is 1920x540 per eye. FullSBS is 1920x1080 per eye. On passive 3D screens (polarized glasses) you won't really see a difference between HTAB and FullSBS, as the passive screen uses every second line for the second eye, so in 3D mode you end up with half the vertical resolution. The worst thing you can do is to play a HSBS file on a passive 3D screen, because you'll basically end up with 960x540 per eye. For active 3D displays (shutter glasses) you won't see a real difference between HSBS and HTAB, but you'll notice HTAB/SBS vs FullSBS/MVC. However, some might say that HSBS is looking better than HTAB. The reason for this IIRC is, that the human brain can better deal with horizontally stretched pixel then vertically ones, so it will better "compensate" the dissortion. I at least heard something like that years ago, related to anamorph video scaling.

(2016-12-05, 23:13)hausmanis Wrote:

(2016-12-05, 23:06)movie78 Wrote:

(2016-12-05, 22:52)hausmanis Wrote: going from the q10pro to the x9s was probably the worst "upgrade" ive done.

x9s is so much worse than the q10pro acording to me, i got so much lagg, ethernet lost and shit bugs in the x9s its driving my crazy

q10pro is a final product
x9s is in beta

Dunno why anyone would rank x9s higher than q10pro but thats why i thought i made a upgrade buying this bad product that x9s is atm

I agreed with you, I gave my Q10 Pro to my Brother and got X8, now I am scratching my head, want to tell him that I want my device back but I can't.

Yeah i sold my Q10 Pro, stupid mistake but honestly tho, how can X9S be ranked higher here ? its so shitty compared to q10pro
Like this evening, me and my wife trying to watch simple 720p content but it keeps crashing due to ethernet lost... we got perfect 1gbit lan setup

(2016-12-06, 00:15)movie78 Wrote: @hdmkv I think you need to revisit your rating, if you have 4 or 5 knowledgeable members expressing the same thing then there is a problem with the device.
To me that X9S/X8 should not be rated anything close to A too much issues.

(2016-12-06, 03:36)hdmkv Wrote: I'm not affiliated with Zidoo, HiMedia or whichever manufacturer it may be. Just a Kodi and A/V playback fan who wants the most versatile media player w/the best PQ and AQ. Best I can do is report based on my findings and tests, but also learn from users. In a way, every media player released is alpha or at best beta (WeTek Play2 for example, and HiMedia Q10 which some are saying is better than Zidoo X9S/X8 also). Maybe I should just nix any grading on media players in the 3D players thread or Zidoo or HiMedia. These were always just meant to be a guide to help out for users, w/caveats as noted in those threads from my POV.

To be honest, at this point, I don't give a s**t. Not trying to be rude, but I'm done reviewing media players, and just happy to be another home theater enthusiast . Happy to nix post #1 from all my reviews and sticky 3D thread if that's what most users would want.