Unable to upgrade XBMCBuntu to 12.3
#16
(2013-12-31, 09:52)wsnipex Wrote: then please don't come complaining that stuff doesn't work. Xbmcs dependencies must be upgraded too....

I am just going to respond to this with a quote straight from the man page of apt

Quote:install
install is followed by one or more packages desired for installation or upgrading. Each package is a package name, not a fully qualified filename (for instance, in a Debian system, apt-utils would be the argument provided, not apt-utils_0.9.9.1~ubuntu1_amd64.deb). All packages required by the package(s) specified for installation will also be retrieved and installed. The /etc/apt/sources.list file is used to locate the desired packages. If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system.

(2013-12-31, 18:18)Thamike Wrote: Hi there. I am new to this forum and i hope i can get some help upgrade my Eden V11 to Frodo.

I did:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:team-xbmc/ppa
sudo apt-get remove xbmc xbmc-bin
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install xbmc xbmc-bin

But still got Eden.

mike@mike-desktop:~$ apt-cache policy xbmc output:
xbmc:
Geïnstalleerd: 2:11.0~git20120423.cd20772-1
Kandidaat: 2:11.0~git20120423.cd20772-1
Versietabel:
*** 2:11.0~git20120423.cd20772-1 0
500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2:11.0~git20120321.14feb09-0ubuntu1~ppa1~maverick 0
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Pa ckages
2:10.1~ppa1~maverick 0
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Pa ckages
N: Kan pakket output: niet vinden

Does somebody knows what i do wrong?

I appreciate all the help.


Are you running maverick? I could be wrong but I dont think the ppa that was suggested to you has frodo.
Reply
#17
(2014-01-01, 00:38)doug piston Wrote:
(2013-12-31, 07:13)FishOil Wrote:
(2013-12-31, 05:47)doug piston Wrote: Doesn't really upgrade the whole OS like dist-upgrade. No reason not to update all your packages, I see no harm.

It does update the ENTIRE OS. Every single package that has an update will be updated. dist-upgrade is actually a bit smarter in the way it upgrades.

Wait till it breaks something you had working perfectly. It happens, and it used to happen frequently.

Its a bad idea and unnecessary.
All it takes is
Code:
sudo apt-get install xbmc

No, it updates packages that have updates. Not your whole OS, and don't spout out about breakage. I use Arch. Arch sucks. Smile

With your method it's no wonder you had issues.

Reading is fundamental Rolleyes. Try it again.
Reply
#18
Anyone experience the jpeglib.h:27:0 make errors?? This is even with Frodo 12.2; I'd just like to get XBMC back because now XBMC won't boot at all. and if I try: apt-get install xbmc xbmc-bin, it says its going to install and take ~70 mb, but It happes so fast theres no way 70 mb is downloaded. Its like the bunk 12.3 install is in the cache? Pretty sure I screwed up thinking upgrading to 12.3 was a good idea.

http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid...pid1586655
Reply
#19
(2014-01-01, 00:38)doug piston Wrote: With your method it's no wonder you had issues.

Issues? I never had any issues. I wonder why.......hmm.
Reply
#20
Thamike, jas722: your ubuntu installs are way too old and deprecated. You'll have to upgrade to at least precise(12.04)
Reply
#21
bs0d: apt-cache policy xbmc
Reply
#22
Unlike some distros, upgrading your all packages that are marked for upgrade is rarely a problem, because ubuntu never do a major package version bump in the life of a release. This doesn't apply though if you are bumping a release, eg 12.04 to 12.10.

Also it makes sense to upgrade for security issues, and for bugfixes.

So while it pays to look at the list and make sure it is sane (and run upgrade with -V so you can see version info) you are unlikely to run into too many problems.

Ps having said that, the safest rule for an appliance media box is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Reply
#23
(2014-01-01, 10:43)wsnipex Wrote: Thamike, jas722: your ubuntu installs are way too old and deprecated. You'll have to upgrade to at least precise(12.04)

Hi Wsnipex.

My Ubuntu is 12.04 so how can it be way to old?
Reply
#24
(2014-01-01, 04:41)FishOil Wrote:
(2014-01-01, 00:38)doug piston Wrote:
(2013-12-31, 07:13)FishOil Wrote: It does update the ENTIRE OS. Every single package that has an update will be updated. dist-upgrade is actually a bit smarter in the way it upgrades.

Wait till it breaks something you had working perfectly. It happens, and it used to happen frequently.

Its a bad idea and unnecessary.
All it takes is
Code:
sudo apt-get install xbmc

No, it updates packages that have updates. Not your whole OS, and don't spout out about breakage. I use Arch. Arch sucks. Smile

With your method it's no wonder you had issues.

Reading is fundamental Rolleyes. Try it again.

I am going to say we have a difference in opinion and leave it at that and let this thread move along without us bickering.
Reply
#25
(2014-01-01, 17:12)Thamike Wrote:
(2014-01-01, 10:43)wsnipex Wrote: Thamike, jas722: your ubuntu installs are way too old and deprecated. You'll have to upgrade to at least precise(12.04)

Hi Wsnipex.

My Ubuntu is 12.04 so how can it be way to old?

right, but you have our PPA added for maverick(10.10)
2:11.0~git20120321.14feb09-0ubuntu1~ppa1~maverick 0
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Pa ckages
2:10.1~ppa1~maverick 0
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Pa ckages

remove that and add it again with add-apt-repository ppa:team-xbmc/ppa
Reply
#26
(2014-01-01, 10:45)wsnipex Wrote: bs0d: apt-cache policy xbmc

wsnipex: heres the result of that command :
Code:
xbmc:
  Installed: 2:12.3~git20131213.0944-frodo-0quantal
  Candidate: 2:12.3~git20131213.0944-frodo-0quantal
  Version table:
*** 2:12.3~git20131213.0944-frodo-0quantal 0
        500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/ quantal/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2:11.0~git20120510.82388d5-1ubuntu2 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/universe i386 Packages

I can't get xbmc to open or anything.
Reply
#27
edited

any error? debug log...
Reply
#28
(2014-01-01, 10:45)wsnipex Wrote: bs0d: apt-cache policy xbmc

(2014-01-01, 18:46)wsnipex Wrote: edited

any error? debug log...

Yes when I try to install via /bootstrap, /config, /make -- during make, I get these errors:

Frodo 12.3 install:
Code:
CPP     xbmc/guilib/JpegIO.o
In file included from /usr/local/include/jpeglib.h:27:0,
                 from JpegIO.h:29,
                 from JpegIO.cpp:29:
/usr/local/include/jmorecfg.h:263:16: error: expected identifier before numeric constant
/usr/local/include/jmorecfg.h:263:16: error: expected ‘}’ before numeric constant
/usr/local/include/jmorecfg.h:263:16: error: expected unqualified-id before numeric constant
/usr/local/include/jmorecfg.h:263:36: error: expected declaration before ‘}’ token

If I try to install 12.2, I get a similar result:
Code:
CPP     xbmc/pictures/Picture.o
In file included from /usr/local/include/jpeglib.h:27:0,
                 from /home/mediacenter/Downloads/xbmc-12.2/xbmc/guilib/JpegIO.h:29,
                 from Picture.cpp:35:
/usr/local/include/jmorecfg.h:263:16: error: expected identifier before numeric constant
/usr/local/include/jmorecfg.h:263:16: error: expected ‘}’ before numeric constant
/usr/local/include/jmorecfg.h:263:16: error: expected unqualified-id before numeric constant
/usr/local/include/jmorecfg.h:263:36: error: expected declaration before ‘}’ token
make[1]: *** [Picture.o] Error 1
make: *** [xbmc/pictures/pictures.a] Error 2

And recall if I install via command line (sudo apt-get install xbmc xbmc-bin), that's when it behaves as if it's using a cache version and not actually downloading 70mb and installing because the command completes in a matter of seconds.
Reply
#29
who told you to compile manually? according to apt you already have the correct package installed, so unless for broke it with some manual installation, it should work...
Reply
#30
(2014-01-01, 18:21)wsnipex Wrote:
(2014-01-01, 17:12)Thamike Wrote:
(2014-01-01, 10:43)wsnipex Wrote: Thamike, jas722: your ubuntu installs are way too old and deprecated. You'll have to upgrade to at least precise(12.04)

Hi Wsnipex.

My Ubuntu is 12.04 so how can it be way to old?

right, but you have our PPA added for maverick(10.10)
2:11.0~git20120321.14feb09-0ubuntu1~ppa1~maverick 0
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Pa ckages
2:10.1~ppa1~maverick 0
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Pa ckages

remove that and add it again with add-apt-repository ppa:team-xbmc/ppa

Thank you very much. That helped.
Its working now.
Reply

Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
Unable to upgrade XBMCBuntu to 12.30