• 1
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20(current)
  • 21
  • 22
Native Object-Based Storage Support for XBMC
Hey could you test what kind of read/write performance you're getting with your setup, would like to compare it to something like ZFS which can be really fast if you have a good setup.

One thing I'm having trouble finding is if I can have an SSDs as cache, similar to ZFS, to boost read/write speed. If I were to use Openstack Swift it would be for more than movie, I do some high performance applications as well. I know there is Openstack Cider for block storage, but I'm not sure if it can be ran on the same server as Swift.
Reply
Well if you won't say, then I won't give you any suggestions on things I have all ready tried that proved fruitful.
Since you are posting in a public forum I would think a back and forth idea exchange is helpful. But apparently you have the answers and just want the rest of us to guess. So have fun.
Reply
(2014-02-01, 09:14)Harro Wrote: Well if you won't say, then I won't give you any suggestions on things I have all ready tried that proved fruitful.
Since you are posting in a public forum I would think a back and forth idea exchange is helpful. But apparently you have the answers and just want the rest of us to guess. So have fun.
+1
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Reply
Fellas,
I have to work in the real world sometimes. Getting an internet connection in West Brava (Cape Verde) is not always easy...
Like I said, I just want my library to grow and not have to worry about size. 512MB, OR 512GB, or 512TB, 512ExB...
Reply
For those interested: OpenStack Operations Guide [PDF]
Reply
Hmm jacintech.fire the man that never gives up. Smile)
Yeah, Me, Myself, and I, The Three Musketeers
Image
Reply
(2014-02-12, 13:05)TerrorKeed Wrote: Hmm jacintech.fire the man that never gives up. Smile)
This is the future...Change is hard and if we ONLY did what we were supposed to do, we would still be living in caves, wouldn't we Rofl
Reply
True
Yeah, Me, Myself, and I, The Three Musketeers
Image
Reply
(2014-02-11, 21:14)jacintech.fire Wrote: For those interested: OpenStack Operations Guide [PDF]

Going to need to find some time to read it. Hows openstack holding up??
Reply
(2014-02-12, 18:44)jacintech.fire Wrote:
(2014-02-12, 13:05)TerrorKeed Wrote: Hmm jacintech.fire the man that never gives up. Smile)
This is the future...Change is hard and if we ONLY did what we were supposed to do, we would still be living in caves, wouldn't we Rofl
Then again, if it ain't broke, don't fix it!

I am not sure what is broken about current storage models for the amount of data commonly stored by home xbmc users.

And providing storage for TBs of movies/tv files in a non home or shared environment is almost certainly illegal without permission of the copyright holders, I don't see the point of such a complex technology hammer to crack the home storage peanut.
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Reply
(2014-02-12, 23:10)nickr Wrote:
(2014-02-12, 18:44)jacintech.fire Wrote:
(2014-02-12, 13:05)TerrorKeed Wrote: Hmm jacintech.fire the man that never gives up. Smile)
This is the future...Change is hard and if we ONLY did what we were supposed to do, we would still be living in caves, wouldn't we Rofl
Then again, if it ain't broke, don't fix it!

I am not sure what is broken about current storage models for the amount of data commonly stored by home xbmc users.

And providing storage for TBs of movies/tv files in a non home or shared environment is almost certainly illegal without permission of the copyright holders, I don't see the point of such a complex technology hammer to crack the home storage peanut.

"Our Honorable judge" You've opposed this thread right from start and nothing in here impresses you don't you know it's time to stop for once...

afterall there is small saying that : "If you can't join them, leave them be" Wink
Yeah, Me, Myself, and I, The Three Musketeers
Image
Reply
I just got the hardware to build the first Openstack cluster. For now is just three nodes of approx 10TB each. The plans is to do the following
1) Build the openStack Stack and enable the compute, storage and networking module
2) Export the stored objects as samba shares and link it with XBMC as is (this is the trickiest part, as the objects must be stored in such a way that I can either interact directly with the object store; or within a volume that I can export using samba...)
3) Write a utility to "dump" a portion of the media library into the Object Store
4) DO real world testing of the whole setup with XBMC and compare it with the current setup
5) Determine if Openstack "holds the mustard"; if yes
6) Move the rest of the library (brag about it endlessly on the list, name myself king of the world, etc.); if no
7) Fess up and beg for forgiveness

Also, please keep in mind that like yourselves, I have a "real world" job to attend to and right now things are a bit busy. I haven't had the time to re-visit this whole experiment in a few weeks and will not be able to for another week or so...please be patient, as soon as I have everything up and running, I will post the step-by-step I've taken...
Reply
(2014-02-13, 10:18)TerrorKeed Wrote:
(2014-02-12, 23:10)nickr Wrote:
(2014-02-12, 18:44)jacintech.fire Wrote: This is the future...Change is hard and if we ONLY did what we were supposed to do, we would still be living in caves, wouldn't we Rofl
Then again, if it ain't broke, don't fix it!

I am not sure what is broken about current storage models for the amount of data commonly stored by home xbmc users.

And providing storage for TBs of movies/tv files in a non home or shared environment is almost certainly illegal without permission of the copyright holders, I don't see the point of such a complex technology hammer to crack the home storage peanut.

"Our Honorable judge" You've opposed this thread right from start and nothing in here impresses you don't you know it's time to stop for once...

afterall there is small saying that : "If you can't join them, leave them be" Wink

Could you explain then how the average xbmc user is going to benefit from this technology.
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Reply
Short answer: Once this is deployed, you no longer have to worry about the size of your library, where it is stored, how to manage it, etc. etc. etc...ad infinitum...
Reply
Well maybe, but:

1. you still need to buy disks when you run out of space; and
2. you seem to need quite a few servers to make it work - most people want as simple and inexpensive a setup as possible in their home.

I mean neat to see you working on this, but can't see the point for most users.

Then again no one will ever need more than 640k ram!
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Reply
  • 1
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20(current)
  • 21
  • 22

Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
Native Object-Based Storage Support for XBMC5