Posts: 3,420
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
95
Piers
R.I.P. (2024)
Posts: 3,420
What happened to the some of the category names? They appear to have grown hugely in length - that's certainly not going to fit in with some languages...
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
All these double word labels way too long and unnecessary (im sure better and more terse single words can be found), I've looked and looked and this seems way excessive the way you "reorganised" most of these, will give the test build a run to give more detailed feedback.
Double word labels just that alone kills it for me. In any foreign language you get a huge scrolling label and you need to let it scroll to read what it says before you know if you in right place. For a change thats suppose to make it easier and simple, that alone is the kryptonite for that Superman.
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
2015-03-10, 14:04
(This post was last modified: 2015-03-10, 14:05 by un1versal.)
Yep, Parent Category (Single word labels) with all subcategories inside again single word labels also) makes sense. But you cant spend 5 minutes waiting for a whole lable to scroll before you know what it is, Ive repeated this from the beginning of this thread no not much avail I may add.
This needs some thought the whole lot, pen to paper sort of thing, because the implications on support alone are horrendous to contemplate.
Posts: 3,420
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
95
Piers
R.I.P. (2024)
Posts: 3,420
My original main labels are short enough, although Media Management would be more suited as being named 'Media' or simply 'Sources'.
Posts: 10,709
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
661
jjd-uk
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 10,709
2015-03-10, 18:35
(This post was last modified: 2015-03-10, 18:36 by jjd-uk.)
How about "Display"? as it's settings for the display of content, or would that be easily confused for monitor/tv video output type settings?
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
(2015-03-10, 17:05)Martijn Wrote: (2015-03-10, 17:03)Piers Wrote: My original main labels are short enough, although Media Management would be more suited as being named 'Media' or simply 'Sources'.
I think "Media" or "content" would be most fitting
Content +1
Posts: 4,061
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
90
zag
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 4,061
Content does sound good imo
Posts: 1,514
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
60
Content seems to be fine...
Any ideas regarding the structure?
- - - Tribute to Metallica - - -
If I managed to help you, please click my reputation
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
2015-03-11, 11:09
(This post was last modified: 2015-03-11, 11:15 by un1versal.)
I dont thing progress should be held back by unnecessary pedantic literals. We live in an age where googling is a verb
Things evolve just as long as its in a direction of better superior things and not some mutant aberration where it becomes unrecognisable and no longer suits the given purpose.
Also this is not a OS, this is an application with limited and precious Interface real estate.
That said, often taking a page of what is done elsewhere and adapting it to the target usage is what often works best.
The more I look into this, the guise of making things simpler, I cant help but feel all the simplicity is being sacrificed. I'm always a a fan of K.I.S.S
Posts: 6,255
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation:
115
da-anda
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 6,255
I don't like "Content". It's a media center and not a content center