2015-06-08, 14:30
(2015-06-02, 17:38)hdmkv Wrote: Yes. Just e-mailed them again today, requesting they focus on fixing bugs I noted.
Any word from them
(2015-06-02, 17:38)hdmkv Wrote: Yes. Just e-mailed them again today, requesting they focus on fixing bugs I noted.
(2015-06-08, 03:02)Ned Scott Wrote: My answer is that anything I suggest as an alternative will be up for debate about "hassle". I would argue that a Windows or Linux alternative with external players could be done with less of what I consider "hassle". I would argue that dealing with external players or special builds on a Q5 is not better than doing so on x86 platforms. I would even argue that some people would be better off and feel it is less of a hassle to use two physically different devices and use media stubs (wiki) in Kodi. At least that would have long term support and could be counted on, rather than this absurd wrapper solution. How is that any better than some of the x86 external player options out there? You will never have the full Kodi feature set, period.
You guys love a hacky solution, great, good for you. It's good to know how far people will bend over backwards for certain 3D video file formats.
(2015-06-08, 15:57)Nekromantik Wrote: I do agree its not good using wrapper.
If Kodi supported this chipset it would be a very good box.
I am thinking about returning.
(2015-06-08, 15:07)movie78 Wrote:(2015-06-08, 03:02)Ned Scott Wrote: My answer is that anything I suggest as an alternative will be up for debate about "hassle". I would argue that a Windows or Linux alternative with external players could be done with less of what I consider "hassle". I would argue that dealing with external players or special builds on a Q5 is not better than doing so on x86 platforms. I would even argue that some people would be better off and feel it is less of a hassle to use two physically different devices and use media stubs (wiki) in Kodi. At least that would have long term support and could be counted on, rather than this absurd wrapper solution. How is that any better than some of the x86 external player options out there? You will never have the full Kodi feature set, period.
You guys love a hacky solution, great, good for you. It's good to know how far people will bend over backwards for certain 3D video file formats.
Using Windows and external player to play Bluray 3D is more a hassle the using and Android Media box.
More of us in this thread had HTPC,before converting to the Android box.
If Kodi and windows or standalone was working properly with Bluray 3D, i don't think most of us will be here trying to look for (cheap made Android box) other alternative than windows.
I will like to have one box that does it all,but so far there's none.
(2015-06-08, 16:22)Skank Wrote:(2015-06-08, 15:07)movie78 Wrote:(2015-06-08, 03:02)Ned Scott Wrote: My answer is that anything I suggest as an alternative will be up for debate about "hassle". I would argue that a Windows or Linux alternative with external players could be done with less of what I consider "hassle". I would argue that dealing with external players or special builds on a Q5 is not better than doing so on x86 platforms. I would even argue that some people would be better off and feel it is less of a hassle to use two physically different devices and use media stubs (wiki) in Kodi. At least that would have long term support and could be counted on, rather than this absurd wrapper solution. How is that any better than some of the x86 external player options out there? You will never have the full Kodi feature set, period.
You guys love a hacky solution, great, good for you. It's good to know how far people will bend over backwards for certain 3D video file formats.
Using Windows and external player to play Bluray 3D is more a hassle the using and Android Media box.
More of us in this thread had HTPC,before converting to the Android box.
If Kodi and windows or standalone was working properly with Bluray 3D, i don't think most of us will be here trying to look for (cheap made Android box) other alternative than windows.
I will like to have one box that does it all,but so far there's none.
+1
(2015-06-08, 16:29)looun Wrote:(2015-06-08, 16:22)Skank Wrote:(2015-06-08, 15:07)movie78 Wrote: Using Windows and external player to play Bluray 3D is more a hassle the using and Android Media box.
More of us in this thread had HTPC,before converting to the Android box.
If Kodi and windows or standalone was working properly with Bluray 3D, i don't think most of us will be here trying to look for (cheap made Android box) other alternative than windows.
I will like to have one box that does it all,but so far there's none.
+1
+ 10000
powerdvd and not support external subtitle
(2015-06-09, 10:13)Nekromantik Wrote: my biggest complaint is this box only supports 24hz for 1080p resolution.
For 720p it does not switch to 24hz and there is no 24hz options for screen resolution below 4k.
(2015-06-09, 12:56)Skank Wrote: How do you guys have himedia settings set up for best picture quality? Someone willing to post screens of it?