Posts: 453
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation:
9
And yet, your best option so far........ I'm not sure if something will change with MM.
Posts: 23,376
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
1,089
fritsch
Team-Kodi Developer
Posts: 23,376
2017-01-05, 19:18
(This post was last modified: 2017-01-05, 19:27 by fritsch.)
Yeah, here is the point where you don't have a clue. As Android is the only platform that wants the data RAW and not IEC packed. They package themselves. Therefore they can add pause frames, they can even resample and pack again. So much about BS. And some vendors even end up with 48 khz while you send in 44.1 khz dts ...
Edit: For DD+ it forgets the Atmos bits if integrated ... and so on and so on ...
First decide what functions / features you expect from a system. Then decide for the hardware. Don't waste your money on crap.
Posts: 5,952
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation:
201
Koying
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 5,952
Fritsch means that the RAW data sent by Kodi is IEC encapsulated at Android level, while it is encapsulated at Kodi level for those platform accessing directly the sound device.
The bitstream itself (ie the actual compressed sound data) isn't touched by either.
Pretty sure that Android does not resample DD/DTS and friends, as that needs a decoder and thus a license.
There is some misunderstanding between the port sample rate and the encoded data sample rate...