2019-08-18, 13:56
Added new actresses (done to post #639 - https://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid...pid2877833)
(2019-08-18, 15:26)Captain_Pike Wrote: took a look of the new KyraDB Features, really nice an hope of an implementation in Artwork Beef and other Artwork Tools!1) The collection numbering is done on purpose like this. It's the collection number as defined in the database.
few important things to mention on the character poster sets:First 2 points i think are important for overview and usability, the 3rd is subjective, just my 2 cents, up to you.
- The sets now change their position depending on their votes - exactly as planned! But the collection number changes with! Very confusing for most poeple! (Collection 3, 1, 2) Could we change that the collection number is adapted to the positions, always integer (Collection 1, 2, 3)
- If i scale down the website zoom the new voting boxes got completely destroying the website layout, all random positions! This scale problem is not on the other artwork types, only on the character poster sets.
- This point is subjective but i would prefere a more horizontal layout than vertical for less scrolling and more overview, i would put the voting stuff beside the collection number and not below.
(2019-08-18, 15:26)Captain_Pike Wrote: The sets now change their position depending on their votes - exactly as planned! But the collection number changes with! Very confusing for most poeple! (Collection 3, 1, 2) Could we change that the collection number is adapted to the positions, always integer (Collection 1, 2, 3)Important point! This i mentioned first on testing and i agree with @Captain_Pike It would be clearer and more structured if the collection numbers would always be integer and adapt at the same time as the votes in the sorting.
(2019-08-18, 15:26)Captain_Pike Wrote: If i scale down the website zoom the new voting boxes got completely destroying the website layout, all random positions! This scale problem is not on the other artwork types, only on the character poster sets.Tested out on upscale and downscale on 3 most common browsers, no problem, it's working fine!
(2019-08-18, 15:54)rschiks Wrote: 3) Find this one difficult. A browser is designed for vertical scrolling, not horizontal. I did horizontal scrolling with the actors of a movie. Somehow it doesn't feel right. Maybe because you need a mouse and can't use touch gestures (like on an iPad). In my browser I use the scroll wheel of the mouse to scroll up and down fast.I think @Captain_Pike meant something else. I think he meant to reduce the distances by placing the votes next to and not below the collection number. So you still have as many sets centrally in view.
(2019-08-18, 17:01)chrissix Wrote: I think @Captain_Pike meant something else. I think he meant to reduce the distances by placing the votes next to and not below the collection number. So you still have as many sets centrally in view.That was exactly what I meant. Previously you could see up to 4 collections at once, now only 3. The upper bar alone alone needs a fifth of the browser window, so that anyway less space is there to show at once.
But as he said... that's subjective... overview is important, structure is important.
Like this:
(2019-08-18, 17:01)chrissix Wrote: In my opinion it isn't really necessary that the votes taken by me are highlightend, still prefer a "neutral" view, fanart.tv does also not do that (i just can click the vote button once, every else push the button will be ignored, but no indicator if i voted yet)Maybe a Setting in a Checkbox could be made in the user Settings like "show own votes highlightened" (or not)
But that's also subjective.
(2019-08-18, 18:29)rmrector Wrote: Just chiming in on the character poster set numbering: we definitely definitely need an identifier that doesn't change, so that today I can say I like "Collection 1", then I can come back 6 months from now and still find that poster set as "Collection 1". The current functionality is good, and if there is any adjustment to the UI design that is still a helpful property to keep.The collection_number in the database won't change. If a user likes collection 1 it remains the same collection 1 returned by the API and it still contains the same posters.
(2019-08-18, 18:29)rmrector Wrote: Just chiming in on the character poster set numbering: we definitely definitely need an identifier that doesn't change, so that today I can say I like "Collection 1", then I can come back 6 months from now and still find that poster set as "Collection 1". The current functionality is good, and if there is any adjustment to the UI design that is still a helpful property to keep.@rmrector Great to hear you will make the final step upgrading KyraDB artwork types in Artwork Beef from basic implementation to full implementation with vote system. (i guess the implementation of language tags already done)
(2019-08-18, 19:23)rschiks Wrote: I will give some thought about the GUI numbering. It won't be that difficult to change the numbering in the GUI and still the like of the member moving along with it.
(2019-08-18, 19:25)rschiks Wrote: This week I won't be doing that much, but upcoming weekend I will have a look.Really nice! Looking forward to it!
(2019-08-23, 23:56)chrissix Wrote: When clicking on KyraDB main page on "Latest animated backgrounds:" it's showing equal same "Latest animated posters:"It was actually showing the latest animated images (both posters and backgrounds)....but I know, it's confusing. I have changed it. Now the posters shows the posters and the backgrounds shows the backgrounds.