Posts: 13
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation:
0
2012-04-09, 17:52
(This post was last modified: 2012-04-14, 11:33 by gneville.)
Quick question -
Is there any reason to install XBMCbuntu over installing Ubuntu, followed by XBMC linux?
Thanks!
Posts: 13
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation:
0
Little bump - still for an answer to this please!
Posts: 2,529
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
8
No, unless you want it automatically setup in a, for most people, good way.
Posts: 262
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
7
Need desktop functionality? You're better off with Ubuntu 11.10 + XBMC Eden. This will require a little extra setup to install the software sources for proprietary video drivers.
Want more of an HTPC appliance that boots straight into XBMC? XBMCbuntu.
HTPC 1 - Zotac ZBOX ID80U | 4GB RAM | 64GB SSD | Openelec | Confluence
HTPC 2 - Zotac ZBOX ID41U | 4GB RAM | 60GB SSD | Openelec | Confluence
Server -
unRAID Server | 3 x 2TB WD Green HDD, 1TB WD Black HDD (Cache) | Sabnzbd | CouchPotato | Sickbeard
Posts: 448
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
6
XBMCbuntu still has a desktop behind it, well a windows manager anyway. for me a true HTPC appliance wouldnt need to load all that extra weight. for me a htpc appliance like experience
is a minimal ubuntu installation with xbmc installed. can always use a control+alt+f1 etc
to get to terminal to do any maintences or ssh into it, and that can be done from a rooted
tablet or smat phone or other pc.
In a world without walls and fences who needs windows and gates, open source, opens minds, so open yours today.
Posts: 11
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
0
2012-04-28, 14:26
(This post was last modified: 2012-04-28, 14:34 by Despotism.)
I went with Ubuntu 11.10 + XBMC (Eden) because I needed a full desktop behind it. My MediaCenter is managing a more then just XBMC.
It's wireless and needed special wireless drivers
It's also the gateway for my DirecTV DVR (I'm using the DVR connected to the PC's LAN Port.
The box itself houses my 6TB Array, which SMB Is managing to share out locally.
The Array is also backing up our Pictures/Important files automatically (scripted) to a remote location with a friend who is also backing up his Pictures/Files to my Array. This is done for redundancy and it's remote storage.
The RAID Array also needed it's own drivers installed
I have Hamachi Installed on Ubuntu allowing me to access my media anywhere in the world ( Travel a lot ) My connection is fat enough to direct stream BluRay quality movies.
Ubuntu also manages my Personal MFP (Multi Function Printer) it handles all the spooling etc.
The sound card appeared to work in Ubuntu + XBMC, but with XBMCUbuntu I was unable to get it to run PassThru Audio to DTS/Dolby direct to Receiver.
With XBMXUbuntu I could probably "Command Prompt" install all the above, but I'd still have to install quite a lot of extras.
The way I looked at it was this.
Important Files Backup is required (We lost 3 months of our kids baby photos - Never again)
The Media Center is something the huge backup array is able to run, the extra's are there because of the Media Center.
It is a stand-alone system, can be installed anywhere and can function, but the amount of extra software related to the media center along with the required drivers demands I make all the hardware and non-xbmc related items work first, then XBMC can work seamlessly. This required Ubuntu installed first, then XBMC as an App running at start-up.
Edit:- I did a minimal desktop install though - and went form there. For some reason though the XBMC Interface was slower than the full desktop install. I ended up doing a full install, then removing the garbage I didn't want. Than I cleaned up the system after removing orphan files etc.. I kind of liked that over the minimal install even if it did require a lot more work. I don't know why and I never bothered looking into why the minimal install made XBMC slower though.
Posts: 6
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
0
I see it as XBMCbuntu has a minimal desktop and any application you would think of using in desktop apart from the internet will need to be installed, its cut down to nothing.
Ubuntu has lots of apps pre installed to make it easy to use but add bloat.
I use XBMCbuntu as I ssh in to do things via command prompt. If you want to use a desktop thats easy to use and has everything you want the Ubuntu and then XBMC is the way. But I do like the way XBMCbuntu auto logging in to xbmc I used to have XBMC open at start up on my ubuntu and it had to load all the desktop and other apps first and just got in the way in the background while XBMC was running.
Posts: 6
Joined: May 2011
Reputation:
0
I am running xubuntu 12.04 and XBMC eden and it runs great for me, i am using an AMD fusion chipset.
Posts: 177
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation:
3
Mick, try OpenElec 3.1 that was released today. It's all you need.
Posts: 459
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
14
As a relative Linux noob like yourself (made the plunge last year), I would probably go for Lubuntu/Xubuntu plus XBMC. They are less resource hungry than a standard Ubuntu install and take very little getting used to for anyone familiar with Xp. Also much gentler intro to the world of Linux than trying to ssh into an openelec box straight away.
Having said that, if you only plan to use the box as a standalone HTPC with a library and a few xbmc.org addons, then OpenElec is great.