[tfouto]

Yes but this "Celeron N2820" is way more powerful compared to the Celeron 847 (1,1GHz vs. 2,4GHz). Btw, this was just a example. There will be "h" NUCs with i3 and i5 too. The "h" stands for "high" wich means that there is space for a standard 2,5" HDD or SSD.

I am not so sure...

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...40+1.10GHz

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=...Hz&id=2109

the second link is the N2810 and not the 2820. But almost the same. Only 0,4 ghz...

I dont understand this results... Maybe because of 2MB vs 1MB Cache?

I would not rely on that site... the old celeron is 17W TDP and the new one 4,5/7,5W with the same power in that synthetic Benchmark wich says nothing about real world performance...

Well maybe that's the reason. This new Celeron have much less power, at the expense of performance. They managed to lower power comsumption, and level the performance.

I think this CPU score is a good indicator of real world performance. Synthetic benchmarks are not everything for sure, but they give at least some useful information.

Sandy Bridge->Ivy bridge->Haswell had only marginal performance improvements ~ 10%. Power consumption/tablets is where Intel is focusing right now.