Posts: 26,215
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation:
187
SVN has a fix, yes. Whether or not it fixes it or not is another story. Please update and test.
Posts: 3,805
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
3
elupus
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 3,805
it helps in some issues. thou the policies fix seem to be required still. ( use search and you will find )
Posts: 62
Joined: Oct 2006
Reputation:
0
Quick update...updated to latest SVN build on both xboxs...on one i could see the SMB network but not get anything to play, on the other I could not see the workgroup.
However for those struggling with this I have found that by using UPnP you can access 99% of your files - basically anything recognised by WMP will show up. You can view by Folder too which is good for those whose collections aren't tagged fully! The only vids it hasn't picked up are .mov ones I think.... Havent checked for audio files missing as most of mine are .mp3....
Hope that helps some people!
Posts: 11
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation:
0
Bangel: You reported success on SMB via Vista. Are you using 2.01 or an earlier version prior to the samba upgrade in XBMC?
Posts: 11
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation:
0
If you report success, please let us know if you are using XBMC 2.01 or an older version of XBMC with the old SAMBA code. Months ago when Vista was first in Beta (I was on the testing team), I was able to get the old XBMC to work with Vista with the secpol changes, without a hitch. The focus at this point is getting the latest XBMC working with Vista.
Thanks
Posts: 3,805
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
3
elupus
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 3,805
that is absolutly so, but before that we have to know what the issue is. don't think any dev has a vista machine to test with.
Posts: 11
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation:
0
1stly.. Lets get it working, then lets see if that is feasable.
If I remember correctly, on the prior XBMC SMB version, I still had to tweak the security settings. Though some of the defaults has changed in Vista since the earlier betas, it is possible that Vista didn't leave any holes open for anonymous logon. Time will tell
Posts: 36
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation:
0
Yes! Thank you HUGELY for getting this worked out.
Posts: 8
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation:
0
first off thanks to everyone working to find a solution on this problem.
ok to begin I'm running the 11/29/06 svn build with the smb updates.
pc running vitsa RTM 6.00 i'ved tried every change i can find in the gp editor
and secpol. I also have ethereal and xbmc debug files available to anyone who wants them.
when i acces my smb network i get the same errors everyone else gets and when i correlate the xbmc errors in ethereal it always produces the same error s
when authenticating smb login it returns STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED error
when choosing a FILE it returns
STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
and when accessing a DIRECTORY it returns
NT_STATUS_NOT_A_DIRECTORY
Posts: 3,805
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
3
elupus
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 3,805
that etherreal log would be nice to have a look at.