2007-05-03, 01:28
Some more benchmarks,
Hardware Overlays, 1GHZ/256:
[HDTV][1080i][hdtvtotal].HBOHD.Trailer.mpg
BENCHMARKs: VC: 117.189s VO: 33.824s A: 0.000s Sys: 25.807s = 176.821s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 66.2756% VO: 19.1292% A: 0.0000% Sys: 14.5952% = 100.0000%
oceans_13-tlr2a_h720p.mov
BENCHMARKs: VC: 123.391s VO: 15.812s A: 0.000s Sys: 7.913s = 147.116s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 83.8730% VO: 10.7482% A: 0.0000% Sys: 5.3788% = 100.0000%
LQ PixelShader, 1GHZ/256:
[HDTV][1080i][hdtvtotal].HBOHD.Trailer.mpg
BENCHMARKs: VC: 116.058s VO: 33.108s A: 0.000s Sys: 25.484s = 174.649s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 66.4520% VO: 18.9566% A: 0.0000% Sys: 14.5913% = 100.0000%
oceans_13-tlr2a_h720p.mov
BENCHMARKs: VC: 124.163s VO: 15.826s A: 0.000s Sys: 5.502s = 145.491s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 85.3409% VO: 10.8776% A: 0.0000% Sys: 3.7814% = 100.0000%
Looks like both hardware overlays & LQ PixelShader improve VO? I'm having trouble interpreting these logs is there any online matrial that explains mplayer debug log outputs?
Hardware Overlays, 1GHZ/256:
[HDTV][1080i][hdtvtotal].HBOHD.Trailer.mpg
BENCHMARKs: VC: 117.189s VO: 33.824s A: 0.000s Sys: 25.807s = 176.821s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 66.2756% VO: 19.1292% A: 0.0000% Sys: 14.5952% = 100.0000%
oceans_13-tlr2a_h720p.mov
BENCHMARKs: VC: 123.391s VO: 15.812s A: 0.000s Sys: 7.913s = 147.116s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 83.8730% VO: 10.7482% A: 0.0000% Sys: 5.3788% = 100.0000%
LQ PixelShader, 1GHZ/256:
[HDTV][1080i][hdtvtotal].HBOHD.Trailer.mpg
BENCHMARKs: VC: 116.058s VO: 33.108s A: 0.000s Sys: 25.484s = 174.649s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 66.4520% VO: 18.9566% A: 0.0000% Sys: 14.5913% = 100.0000%
oceans_13-tlr2a_h720p.mov
BENCHMARKs: VC: 124.163s VO: 15.826s A: 0.000s Sys: 5.502s = 145.491s
BENCHMARK%: VC: 85.3409% VO: 10.8776% A: 0.0000% Sys: 3.7814% = 100.0000%
Looks like both hardware overlays & LQ PixelShader improve VO? I'm having trouble interpreting these logs is there any online matrial that explains mplayer debug log outputs?