2016-02-20, 22:30
@natethomas - I have an idea to aid in this hard fought battle. How about coming up with a list of criteria for the organisations (e.g. google, facebook, twitter etc) to receive as part of the reports so they can start to proactively block future or missed current items.
Also Google has its own form of Facebook (Google+ and/or Hang outs).
In addition has anyone considered making reports or requests for search engines to stop listing the affected items in results. The reason being if people don't know or have the exact address for some reason then they will use a search engine.
If they don't have the exact address and no result in the search engine then it will be most likely much harder for them to be able to get to where these items are supplied. The list of criteria for sending to the companies or watch dog organisations would allow them to select other matching items which were missed from the reports (also they could then be fed into computer systems - possibly as part of an algorithm). The algorithm would block or remove the items from the system.
Also Google has its own form of Facebook (Google+ and/or Hang outs).
In addition has anyone considered making reports or requests for search engines to stop listing the affected items in results. The reason being if people don't know or have the exact address for some reason then they will use a search engine.
If they don't have the exact address and no result in the search engine then it will be most likely much harder for them to be able to get to where these items are supplied. The list of criteria for sending to the companies or watch dog organisations would allow them to select other matching items which were missed from the reports (also they could then be fed into computer systems - possibly as part of an algorithm). The algorithm would block or remove the items from the system.
