2016-10-19, 17:06
(2016-10-19, 11:20)Diodato Wrote:(2016-10-18, 19:35)Milhouse Wrote: Yes, it's PR10706 in #1015:
It's been recognised that this change has removed the numeric seek support (see github comments), however at the moment it's not clear what the future plans are for this lost feature.
Got it. Thank you for the info.
It would be a pity to loose the only way of precise time-seeking.
I believe it doesn't overlap in functionality with additive seek, but both complement each other.
2nd, I'd be pretty annoyed with the loss of direct timecode entry
