"CoverJuke" and "PictureFlow", two other ways of doing CoverFlow

  Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Reply
Gamester17 Offline
Team-XBMC Forum Moderator
Posts: 10,522
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 10
Location: Sweden
Question  "CoverJuke" and "PictureFlow", two other ways of doing CoverFlow
Post: #1
"coverJuke" and "PictureFlow", are using two other different ways of doing Cover Flow than the current method used in XBMC.

Are those methods any better (more effective/optimized) or worse (less effective/optimized) than XBMC existing code?



just asking Big Grin
find quote
jmarshall Offline
Team-XBMC Developer
Posts: 26,216
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation: 185
Post: #2
They're different.

They don't fit in with the skinning engine of XBMC which doesn't force the skinner into a particular style (well, tries not to at least!) but rather allows the skinner to create any layout they want (within the constraints of the engine).

Both of those apps force the layout into the standard coverflow layout.


Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forum before posting.
Do not e-mail XBMC-Team members directly asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules.
For troubleshooting and bug reporting please make sure you read this first.

[Image: badge.gif]
find quote