2016-06-17, 13:16
(2016-06-17, 09:43)T800 Wrote: Can I take it that the NUC5i3RYK is just as good for Kodi/3D/Bitstream as the NUC5i5RYK, only the processing power is less?
More than enough..
(2016-06-17, 09:43)T800 Wrote: Can I take it that the NUC5i3RYK is just as good for Kodi/3D/Bitstream as the NUC5i5RYK, only the processing power is less?
(2016-06-17, 13:16)movie78 Wrote:(2016-06-17, 09:43)T800 Wrote: Can I take it that the NUC5i3RYK is just as good for Kodi/3D/Bitstream as the NUC5i5RYK, only the processing power is less?
More than enough..
(2016-06-19, 01:28)nickr Wrote: Are you referring to rpi or x86?
(2016-06-19, 05:48)nickr Wrote: Then yes, I would wonder how long support will go on in an effectively branched version of kodi.
(2016-06-21, 11:48)ivota Wrote: Why MVC not supported 3D Frame Sequential?
(2016-06-19, 21:29)TheShoe Wrote: Here's hoping he at least merges in Kodi v17 when it goes "gold"For Windows MVC build? Won't happen. Developer has explained that as MVC feature requires a patched build of ffmpeg, it unfortunately isn't acceptable for mainline.
(2016-06-22, 22:14)hdmkv Wrote:(2016-06-19, 21:29)TheShoe Wrote: Here's hoping he at least merges in Kodi v17 when it goes "gold"For Windows MVC build? Won't happen. Developer has explained that as MVC feature requires a patched build of ffmpeg, it unfortunately isn't acceptable for mainline.
(2016-06-17, 13:16)movie78 Wrote:(2016-06-17, 09:43)T800 Wrote: Can I take it that the NUC5i3RYK is just as good for Kodi/3D/Bitstream as the NUC5i5RYK, only the processing power is less?
More than enough..