(2020-07-03, 03:13)Waterbottle23 Wrote: (2020-07-02, 19:17)jjd-uk Wrote: (2020-07-02, 17:04)Waterbottle23 Wrote: I tried disabling the adjust refresh rate.
So the display will still be at 60Hz.
I dun see any difference on video quality and motion on 60Hz for movies.
I googled and people say the video will judder if 24p video is playing on display with 60Hz. But seriously i don’t.
I find that when we set adjust refresh rate to start/stop, sometimes after exiting Kodi, when i go into desktop and open file explorer, the whites & yellow folders are still with HDR applied even though my resolution is only 4kUHD.
Any idea?
For a good explanation see https://www.projectorcentral.com/judder_24p.htm
Basically people are susceptible to different things, some find the pulldown judder easy to spot and want to avoid it by playing natively in 24fps, however others find the inherent motion judder in 24fps off putting.
Thanks! It’s a good read.
So in layman terms conclusion, does it mean the following,
Judder is created by filming process itself (if no stabilising equipment is attached to camera).
Thus if a film is captured using stabilizers, playing in either 24 & 60Hz will not matter.
And if the film no captured by stabilizers and in 60FPS, then playing on 60Hz refresh rate will eliminate this.
I watched saving private Ryan 4kUHD. And in the beginning Normandy beach scene, I suppose those are all judders because the cameraman is not using any stabilizers to film. Am i right?
And if play in 60Hz, the motion will be blur and reduce the juddering.
Ultimately, it depends on individual if they are purists who prefer juddering or no/less juddering effect.
the term "judder" tends to be used by different people to mean different things. It has to be qualified to understand what is meant.
There is in general a relationship between frame rate and shutter speed / exposure time per frame. When movies were first created, there were limits on the minimum exposure time for a frame to receive sufficient light to expose the film (even then, sets had to be tremendously lit). The camera shutter was an actual wheel that rotated in front of the film, with openings in it (so the film was exposed while the open portion was in front of the film. The film would be advanced to the next frame when the shutter was in its occluded area). So the shutter would be measured in terms of angular degrees that allowed film to be exposed.
When camera or subjects were in motion, some of that motion would be recorded as smearing or "motion blur". But in between frame exposures the camera or subjects would still be in motion, so the next frame would appear slightly offset in position from the proceeding one. That's been called "motion judder". Over time, we've become so accustomed to seeing that in movies that it has become the standard or expected "film-like" appearance. When it's eliminated (with modern cameras that can use much shorter exposures and high frame-rates) it's considered (by purists) to be the dreaded "soap opera effect" or SOE.
(As an aside, the 24 fps didn't become a standard until they figured out how to record a sound track onto the film. Previously, the camera operator would vary the speed, often going slower when there wasn't motion to allow longer exposure and faster when there was. This meant the projectionist was also an artist, as during playback you had to also vary the speed. Though some theater owners would order projectionists to intentionally speed up the projection to squeeze in an extra showing per day. Note that a frame was 1 inch high, so a nominal 24fps would be run at 120 feet per minute shown on a "speedometer".)
A further complication is displaying 24 frame movies on a 30/60 frame display, since 24 doesn't divide 60 evenly. To do that they would use telecine equipment that would repeat frames alternating twice or three times (24x5=120 so works with 60 fps display). This uneven playback speed is often called "3:2 judder". There are also issues of the effect of repeating frames and how that is displayed. Display devices don't work the same way as a reflected projection screen does.
(by no means an expert, so corrections welcome.)
scott s.
.