[brazen1]

I should add, in the past the file size MAY have increased because I used two pass during the encode. @DJisumi informed me that the additional file size was due to interpolation added to the rip. While I noticed no side effects, other than the size increase, it does add a bunch of time to the encode. Let's put it this way. With my old GTX 650Ti, a movie took about 12 hours to rip. With my GTX 960, 3 hours. But, I'm only single passing. Why? DJisumi said it will guess most of the interpolation added. That would be bad data imo although I didn't see it. Besides, I support interpolation. Yes, I like it. So, I just let my display do it on the fly and I bet it does a better job than the software. I use FAB.

Just checked. The full BD is 43.4 GB on one of them. The encode of it is 45.3 so yes, there is still a slight increase even after eliminating extra audios.