2015-09-19, 16:45
I think that proves my point, doesn't it? You're not interested in Apple devices so you choose not to support iOS users. I get it, you have to scratch your own itch, right?
You're point about teaching Apple enthusiasts a lesson... Well, I'm not even going there. I don't think you'd hear me way up atop that ivory tower, anyhow.
-p
You're point about teaching Apple enthusiasts a lesson... Well, I'm not even going there. I don't think you'd hear me way up atop that ivory tower, anyhow.
-p
(2015-09-19, 16:29)fritsch Wrote:Quote:Perhaps if you had a newer device, you'd feel differently? I get it, OSS development is focused on the needs of the developer not the special interests of the user base.
^^ this is fully wrong ... you get a "lol" for this.
Basically I don't buy hardware that is closed by design without any public working API - I learned this lesson very hard during implementation of XVBA, which was a similar thing, besides there existed a (bad) API while those apple device were never designed to be used with non apple acked hardware.
With every new IOS release I see more and more people standing up and whining to get their expensively bought devices supported - I really don't want to get the emails memphiiz most likely receives. If we - as OSS devs - really would do something for OSS world: We should not support this kind of binary crap without public api with the full intent to break what was reengineered at all. That way apple buyers would learn their lesson or completely stay in apple land.
And as said before: this is my private opinion.